The income approach adds up the money earned by producers...
Answer:
See attached file
Explanation:
Accounting Equation Formula:
Assets = Liabilities + Stockholders' Equity
The equation shows that Assets are increased by Debits and decreased by Credits, instead, Liabilities and Stockholders´ Equity decreased by Debits and increased by Credits. In the file, Debits and Credits are represented by the word increased and decreased according to if the transaction has a positive or negative effect on each element.
If Professor Siegel is correct that stocks are less risky than bonds, then the risk premium on stock may be zero. Assuming that the risk-free interest rate is 2.5 percent, the growth rate of dividends is 1 percent and the current level of dividends is $70, use the dividend-discount model to compute the level of the S&P 500 that is warranted by the fundamentals.
Instruction: Round your response to 2 decimal places.
The level of the S&P 500 is
Answer:
Dividend discount model:
Price= D(1+g)/r-g
g=growth rate 1%
r= as given in question risk free rate 2.5%
D₀= $70
D₁=$70(1+0.01) with growth rate
Solution:
70(1+0.01)/(0.025-0.01)
=$4713.33
Answer:
April 1
Dr Petty cash $268
Cr Cash $268
April 10
Dr Freight-in (Or Inventory) $76
Dr Supplies expense $41
Dr Dr Postage expense $49
Dr Accounts Receivable/Loan to employees $33
Dr Miscellaneous expense $52
Cr Cash over and short $9
Cr Cash $260
April 20
Dr Petty cash $116
Cr Cash $116
Explanation:
Preparation of the journal entries to record transactions related to petty cash for the month of April.
April 1
Dr Petty cash $268
Cr Cash $268
April 10
Dr Freight-in (Or Inventory) $76
Dr Supplies expense $41
Dr Dr Postage expense $49
Dr Accounts Receivable/Loan to employees $33
Dr Miscellaneous expense $52
Cr Cash over and short $9
($260-$76-$41-$49-$33-$52)
Cr Cash $260
($268-$8)
April 20
Dr Petty cash $116
Cr Cash $116
OPTIONS:
A. economic feasibility
B. legality
C. ethicalness
D. practicality
E. functionality
Answer:
C. ethicalness
Explanation:
Ethicalness as to do with the quality of how morally right a a course of action is. It borders on principles of morality. As stated in the question above, it is already a known fact that the toy has a risk of malfunctioning which could most likely cause injury to the user. Going ahead to launch s toy that can cause injury is morally not right, even though the toy met the set industry standards. We can imply that ethicalness was ignored by the company executive in the decision making.
