Adjective phrase example:
- The boy in the black shirt is my little brother.
Adverb phrase example:
- She loves me very much.
Answer:
The correct answer is <u>C</u>: the disconnection between mind and body.
Explanation:
In this excerpt from The Metamorphosis, Franz Kafka describes the disconnection between mind and body. Gregor tries to resolve a problem with a connection and disconnection between his body, as a result of the monotonous life led by his family.
Nothing should be removed; everything had to stay; he could not do without the good influence the furniture had on his condition.
This part of the excerpt represents the most important evidence between the disconnection of his mind and his body.
Answer:
Poe uses the first line of the story to build suspense in the following manner:
C. Poe informs the reader that Fortunato has wronged the narrator but doesn't say specifically what Fortunato did which creates a sense of uncertainty.
Explanation:
This question is about the short story "The Cask of Amontillado," by author Edgar Allan Poe. Take a look at how the story begins:
<em>THE thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as I best could, but when he ventured upon insult I vowed revenge.</em><em> You, who so well know the nature of my soul, will not suppose, however, that gave utterance to a threat. At length I would be avenged; this was a point definitely, settled --but the very definitiveness with which it was resolved precluded the idea of risk. I must not only punish but punish with impunity. A wrong is unredressed when retribution overtakes its redresser. It is equally unredressed when the avenger fails to make himself felt as such to him who has done the wrong.</em>
<u>We get to know two things from the get-go: the narrator feels that Fortunato has offended him; and the narrator is adamant about avenging himself.</u>
<u>However, at no point does the narrator reveal what Fortunato has done. Apparently, Fortunato has injured him before. Now, it is an offense. But how can we trust this narrator if he does not reveal what happened? Maybe he is too sensitive and took things too personally. Maybe nothing happened at all- he might be insane, for all we know. We are left with this uncertainty, even though the narrator tells us we know him well. We do not. He does not offer us enough information to judge for ourselves.</u>
Answer:
At the end of the third act, the reader already knows that the Franks will be found and taken to the concentration camp. However, the characters are hoping they won't be found.
Explanation:
The end of the third act establishes a strong suspense because it presents the moment when the Frank family came very close to being found and taken to the concentration camps. As you know, the Frank family is a Jewish family, which was hidden during the second world war, fleeing the Nazi regime.
In this act, the suspense controls the Frank family, who know they are very close to being found, but they have hope and believe they can escape this situation. However, this piece is based on a real history and the reader knows that the Franks will be found and taken to concentration camps, where most will die.
