Answer:
Two different authors. One is an essay and one is a poem.But both of them describe nature as the most amazing and beautiful thing that they have ever seen. They saw how wonderful and amazing life is. It's obvious that they have a connection with plants, air, clouds, and trees.
William Wordsworth uses poetry and Nate Muir uses prose, but they both use similar methods describe different things in nature and to communicate to the way nature makes them feel to their audience. They both paint a picture with words.
The writers of "Calypso Borealis", and “I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud,” are similar not just through the diction, vocabulary, but also through the impact of the mood, and tone, while both of the writers express their relationship in different ways there is still the impact on the audience.
Answer:
Well if the bird is a pet it needs to stay in the cage to not fly around all over the place. For instance if an animal is injured or sickly with healthy problems staying in a cage is safer for it because it will not get hurt in the wild.
Explanation:
Hope this helps
Answer:I think true
Explanation:
The topic sentence generally is composed of two parts: (a) the topic itself and (b) the controlling idea.
Answer:
The author's main argument in his essay was to tell how to develop scientific claims reaching to it's final conclusion rather than fascinating claims.
Explanation:
'Sex, Drugs, Disasters, and the Extinction of Dinosaurs' is an essay written by Stephen Jay Gould, a Professor of Geology at Harvard University.
In his essay he explains how dinosaurs extinction took place by elaborating the three elements– sex, drugs, and disaster. By detailing each and every aspects, Gould presents how a good scientific proposal is elaborated. He starts his essay by defining science and how conclusions are reached through series of consequences and not by fascination. Then he goes on the explain his points and reaching the conclusion of his thesis.
Therefore, the main argument by Gould in this essay was to educate his readers how to develop scientific claims reaching to it's final conclusion rather than fascinating claims.
The correct answer is In a scalene triangle, none of the angles are congruent.
Explanation:
A scalene triangle differs from an equilateral and isosceles triangle because in this triangle, the three sides are different in length, and therefore, the inner angles of the triangle have different measures. This implies in each of the triangles Pam drew there are not two equal angles. This makes it impossible for angles to be congruent or to have the same measure in degrees. Therefore, in these triangles none of the angles are congruent.
