Judge Judy because there is no picture
Answer:
Option A -- there is often a conflict between winning political elections and adoption of only productive programs.
Explanation: It's a known fact that, Government action will often result in the counterproductive use of resources because there is often a conflict between winning political elections and adoption of only productive programs. Therefore, Option B, Option C and Option D are wrong in this context.
Answer: The judicial branch had supported their position.
Explanation: As a last resort they planned to bring suit before the Supreme Court because they felt that why should they be expelled from their lands when they no longer threatened white settlements and could compete with them on many levels? They intended to fight their ouster, and they figured they had many ways to do it.
The Supreme Court ruled that The Native Americans were “domestic dependent nations,” subject to the United States as a ward to a guardian. The territory was part of the United States but not subject to action by individual states. However, the missionaries encouraged them to stand fast. When the Native Americans read Marshall’s decision, they had honestly believed that the Nation had won the case, that Georgia lacked authority to control their lives and property, and that the courts would protect them.
Answer:
The right solution is "leads to more NGRI verdicts".
Explanation:
- NGRI seems to be an actionable defense, as well as the claimant submits the plea. At either the result, a jury determines if another individual became NGRI at either the scene of the offense.
- A conviction or attempting to find NGRI indicates that the individual either didn't even understand the inappropriateness of his acts at both the scene of the offense as well as had been unable to strictly adhere his conduct to something like the laws of the nation suffering from a mental disorder rather than deficiency.
