Answer:
Yes a false positive result will be read
Explanation:
Instructions on most pregnancy tests will tell you to read the results in a certain amount of time, usually from a couple of minutes. So you may take a pregnancy test and read it within the above time period as negative.
If you happen to keep the test around to look at later, you may notice that after that allotted time, the test now appears to have a positive result. This is called an evaporation line. It is not indicative of a positive pregnancy test.
What is Evaporation Lines?
Evaporation lines happen when the urine that was on the test area starts to dry out and evaporate. The chemical composition of that particular urine sample has now changed since that urine sample evaporated, sometimes causing the test to show a positive line
A.
I say this because there are other ways to make DNA in plant cells like adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thymine so B is out. Though, Mitochondria does break down waste so part of B is right but that would cancel out C. Without Chloroplasts, a plant cannot make food so D is out as well. Hope this helped!
There is 10 kcal energy left in the 3rd trophic level.
Answer:
If mother 1 is a carrier of hemophilia, it is likely that her son would in fact have hemophilia while the son of mother 2 does not. Mother 1 would have the genotype XᴴXʰ, meaning she has one recessive allele for hemophilia, while the father would have the genotype XᴴY, and would neither be afflicted with hemophilia nor carry it. If you do a punnett square, it shows that the son of mother 1 would have a 50% chance of having hemophilia, since he wouldn't have a second X chromosome with a dominant allele to mask the recessive hemophilia allele. Also, if mother 2 has the homozygous dominant genotype XᴴXᴴ despite the father having hemophilia and the genotype XʰY, a punnett square for this couple proves that their son would have a 0% chance of having hemophilia. Therefore, it is very likely that their sons were not switched at birth and the correct answer is D: The fact that the father in couple 2 has hemophilia would not predispose his son to hemophilia. The first couple has no valid claim. Hope this helped!
