1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Harrizon [31]
3 years ago
10

All across the north, what groups lobbied against the fugitive slave act of 1850?

History
1 answer:
andre [41]3 years ago
3 0

There is a lot of opposition to the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 in the Northern states, which are vehemently against slavery and is the destination of many escaped slaves from the South. Some states tried to nullify the Federal law, notably Wisconsin Supreme Court and Vermont legislature. Of course, abolitionists are vehemently against the law.

You might be interested in
Please help I’ll give brainist and 20 points
son4ous [18]

When Jefferson wrote “all men are created equal” in the preamble to the Declaration, he was not talking about individual equality. ... It now became a statement of individual equality that everyone and every member of a deprived group could claim for himself or herself.

All People have basic Rights that Cannot be taken Away. These are rights that all people have at birth. The government does not grant these rights, and therefore no government can take them away. The Declaration of Independence says that among these rights are “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”

3 0
2 years ago
Which list places events in the correct sequence?
LenaWriter [7]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
why do you think the Sherman Antitrust Act and other attempts at regulating monopolies and trusts were not effective?
Vesna [10]
For more than a decade after its passage, the Sherman Act was invoked only rarely against industrial monopolies, and then not successfully, chiefly because of narrow judicial interpretations of what constitutes trade or commerce among states. When it was first passed, the Sherman Antitrust Act was largely ineffective at stopping industrial monopolies. Courts at the time tended to hold a very narrow view of what constituted “trade or commerce among states,” and most companies were not held liable under the act. For more than a decade after its passage, the Sherman Antitrust Act was invoked only rarely against industrial monopolies, and then not successfully. Ironically, its only effective use for a number of years was against labor unions, which were held by the courts to be illegal combinations.
6 0
3 years ago
How did the government and japanese society react when japan was forced to accept unequal treaties?
kolezko [41]

Answer:

The samurai and daimyo gave back the power to the emperor and worked to reform Japan.

Explanation:

Japan had remained strongly isolated from the rest of the world for hundreds of years. Japan especially never trusted Western powers since they had better technology and were very aggressive and powerful. In 1853, American Commodore Matthew C. Perry, arrived with four US military, steam-powered ships which were equipped with very modern and destructive guns. The Japanese had no means to oppose him in any manner and yielded to his demands, that Japan signed an official treaty of trade and commerce with the United States of America. This treaty, the Convention of Kanagawa angered many of the highest-ranking samurais for whom it was seen as a capitulation. They decided that Japan was way behind Western powers and that unless they imposed radical societal, economic reforms, they would be governed by the West. They managed to remove Tokugawa Yoshinobu, the last Shogun of Japan and restored the Emperor.

Traditionalist samurais were lincensed by this act and a civil war ensued, which reformist samurais were able to win with the help of Western technology and military advisors. Most power was transferred to the Emperor and Japan started massively importing technology and methods of social organization from many different countries in the west.

4 0
4 years ago
What happened as a result of the so-called intolerable Acts?
Alina [70]
Due to the intolerable acts, the continental congress was formed in order to see how the colonies would deal with these acts and prevent them from infringing upon the rights of the colonists. In short, the result was the beginning of the American Liberation war and the writing of the Declaration of Independence which eventually led to the United States becoming a free country.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • During the 1920s, how did excessive use of credit contribute to the start of the Great Depression?
    12·1 answer
  • What was the main reason Britain entered the war
    9·2 answers
  • What was the Red Scare and how did the public react to it?
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement best summarizes the effects of nationalism on Europe
    5·2 answers
  • Como se explica que capitais excedentes foram desenvolvidas na europa do seculo XIX
    9·1 answer
  • The new deal represented a large change away from the way the american economy and government interacted compared to what had be
    6·1 answer
  • What did Elizabeth Fry do ?
    12·2 answers
  • Why do you think Andrew Jackson was so popular in the 1820s and 1830s? Do you think he would be as popular a leader if he were p
    6·1 answer
  • What is a trait the Kingsnake and Dog have in common that the Goldfish does not have?
    15·1 answer
  • Today _____ grants the president a leadership role in proposing legislation. At the same time members of congress feel free to d
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!