Answer:
Reagan presents relevant and sufficient evidence from real-world examples. or......
Reagan’s evidence is relevant but is insufficient to prove his claims as it relies on his own personal beliefs.
Explanation:
Answer:
What does it mean to be "in disgrace" with "men's eyes"?
How are men looking at him?
Based on my understanding of William Shakespeare's Sonnet 29, The emotions portrayed of the speaker in Sonnet 29 are one of depression: he assumes himself to be "in disgrace with fortune," which means that he has been having bad luck. He also feels in disgrace with "men's eyes," concluding that the general public or the society looks at him unfavorably. These two things gave him the implication that he is lonely. Because the public eye looks at him unfriendly.
Explanation:
Based on my understanding of William Shakespeare's Sonnet 29 and upon reading it, I realized my answer.
Answer: option 3
Explanation:
To illustrate the difference between how these two systems work, try to answer the following questions: 1. Consider this argument: All roses are flowers. Some flowers fade quickly. Therefore, some roses fade quickly. Is this argument valid? Does the purported conclusion, that some roses fade quickly, follow from the given starting facts? 2. Now consider this argument: All jozies are floozies. Some floozies are quakes. Therefore, some jozies are quakes. Again, is this argument valid? Does the purported conclusion, that some jozies are quakes, follow from the given starting facts?
