Well bombing Auschwitz would be good because we would kill a bunch of nazis
but on the down side we would also kill the prisoners their. but also most the world outside of germany knew about the camps so even if we could bomb it we didnt even know about them
<span>Germany had to make "reparations payments" to cover the costs of world war 1, and it was these payments that further cripple the Germany economy and helped lead to the outbreak of World War II. </span>
Answer:
I think it is E. A plaintiff is on one side of the case and a defendant is on the other
The economic value of having colonies in the first place was for 3 main reasons
1) attain cheap labour from the native peoples
2) acquire cheap raw materials to bring to the homeland (Europe)
3) open up new markets to trade with
the first two were vital in Britains industrial revolution. Without cheap raw materials, and cheap labourers, the factories and refineries in Britain would have costed far more to maintain and keep supplied. This, in turn, would have slowed down production considerably. There is no doubt in my mind that the industrial revolution would still have taken place in Britain with or without the colonies, but WITH the colonies the process was sped up considerably.
Overall, cheap labour and raw materials attained through Britains colonial interests sped up the industrialisation of the UK.
Every state was given equal representation
