Your answer would be your 3rd answer choice because its shows how the colonists opposed the British treatment. <span />
If both parties involved are blaming the other for the start of the battle, the historian should try to get the statement of a 3rd party witness, preferably one that is impartial and a first-hand witness. This makes the 3rd party witness more credible. This also avoids any self-serving motives of the the US and Iraqi forces.
Answer:
Because they wanted a strong and powerful government. After WWI they were angry because Germany had to take care of the reparations and had to sing the Treaty of Versailles, they felt like this was unfair and wanted justice.
Explanation:
