Rome's government was destroyed by an invasion from Carthage and ruled from Alexandria.
Rome's government was taken over by a leader who was popular with the common people.
Reformers made positive changes in the republic that led to a new government.
Roman generals created a military government, and the army ruled by force.
A major accomplishment of Britain’s Reform Act of 1832 was that it gave voting rights to "all adult males" in society, as opposed to only males of certain classes as before.
The king’s actions that prompted nobles to force the king to sign the Magna Carta was his demand of heavy taxes to fund his unsuccessful wars in France.
This action forced the barons to rebel against the king and the Magna carter was signed in order to limit the king's power.
<h3>What Was the Magna Carter?</h3>
Magna Carta Libertatum, which is shortened as the Magna Carta, is a royal charter of rights agreed to by King John of England at Runnymede, near Windsor, on 15 June 1215. This Charter of rights is referred to as the first known documentation of Human Rights.
Prior to the signing of this charter, the king was viewed as the absolute power and could do as he willed.
Some of his actions were detrimental to the Nobles and in order to preserve his throne from imminent take over, his subjects forced him to sign the Magna Carta.
Learn more about the Magna Carter at brainly.com/question/25378155
#SPJ1
Employee safety, compensation, and legal representation.
Answer:
The Constitution will be approved if it has all the necessary materials.
Explanation:
As a Federalist, I will ratify or approve the Constitution if it has all the necessary materials that is needed to run the country efficiently otherwise it will not be approve at all.
The government is set up under the Constitution by composing of three branches which is the legislative, executive, and judicial. Without these three branches the government will not formed and perform its function.
My point of view on including of a bill of rights is that it is a very important and necessary part of the constitution, without bill of rights the constitution is incomplete.
I disagree with the opposing position of the Anti-Federalist because they are against of more power of the federal government over the states.
