(A quote from an anonymous says : “Over time things change, but some things always stay the same.” From the Era of Foragers, to our Modern Era, our ability to
communicate, organize, create, and destroy have in many ways been altered and also stayed the same. From history we all can now look back and actually see how much things have already been altered, and we can also notice how many things have also remained the same. Some things that will probably always be the same are our race’s ability to be technologically creative. We have an imagination that will virtually never run out, and allows us to always think of new things to change, make, or get rid of to make our lives more convenient. However things that we’re creating or things that we’ve already created are always going to change the way we live.
Answer:
<em>Iroquois</em>: formed a confederation that may have inspired the US constitution
<em>Powhatan: </em>gave women a voice in choosing tribal representatives and helped the first settlers from Europe survive
That is my answer.
Answer:
The National Party was elected in 1948 on the policy of Apartheid ('separateness'). This 'separateness' put South Africans of different racial groups on their own paths in a partitioned system of development.
Explanation:
<h3>Effects of the Group Areas Act</h3>
The GAA had strange implications for governance and responsibility as it became more elaborate and amended. For example, the Coloured townships of Coronationville, Noordgesig, Newclare, Riverlea, and Western Township are administrated by Johannesburg City Council while Bosmont is the responsibility of the Department of Community Development (South African Institute of Race Relations, 1964: 216). The work of welfare organizations was made more difficult by the GAA, like Lunalegwaba House, a group home for African boys, in Johannesburg could not operate because the regulations of the GAA did not allow the White charity to own the property (South African Institute for Race Relations, 1967: 306). People attempted to use the courts to overturn the GAA, though each time they were unsuccessful (Dugard, 1978, 324). Others decided to use civil disobedience and other protests, like ‘sit-ins’ at restaurants, were experienced across South Africa in the early 60s. The 'sit-ins' were not ill-received by the average White citizen, which the South African Institute of Race Relations believed proved that they did not object to sharing restaurants with the other racial groups (1961: 183). There was also resistance from Cape Town City Council who voted before 1964 to keep District Six and the central business district not dedicated to any one racial group; they had the support of the Cape Town Chamber of Commerce on this decision (South African Institute of Race Relations, 1964: 213).
