You've found an Internet article that supports your view of a research subject. The author seems to have excellent credentials,
and the article is very well written. However, the author seems to be using outdated information to support her claims, and you can't find other articles that corroborate her information. Which of the following statements best describes what your course of action should be and why? A. You should not use the article as a reference. Information from the Internet isn't trustworthy. B. You should not use the article as a reference. The lack of corroboration and outdated information outweigh the author's credentials. C. You should use the article as a reference. The author is obviously an expert in her field and the information doesn't need to be "nitpicked." D. You should use the article as a reference. The important thing is that you've found a source that will bolster your arguement.
The second option is most likely the correct answer. If the author is using outdated information, you should not use it as a source, even if the credentials are good. Hope this helps! Brainliest is always welcome!
I have never assume anything. Some of the best looking people I have known were nothing but lousy people. Some of the more bedraggled ones were as pure as the driven snow. Looks are very deceiving. All people are/can be different.
