This question is not complete
Complete Question
Sherry claims that the expression 1/x will always be equivalent to a repeating decimal whenever x is an odd number greater than 1.
Which of these values of x will prove Sherry's claim is false?
Answer:
When x = 5
Step-by-step explanation:
Sherry claims that the expression 1/x will always be equivalent to a repeating decimal whenever x is an odd number greater than 1.
Examples of odd numbers greater than 1 : 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 ....
We would put these odd numbers to test
a) When x = 3
= 1/3 = 0.3333333333
b) When x = 5
= 1/5 = 0.2
c) When x = 7
= 1/7 = 0.142857142
d) When x = 9
= 1/9 = 0.1111111111
e) When x = 11
= 1/11 = 0.0909090909
From the above calculation, we can see that the only odd number greater than 1 that will prove Sherry's theory wrong is when x = 5
Therefore, the value of x that will prove Sherry's claim is false is when x = 5
Answer:
I would say an Oblong.
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>
Brainliest please</h3>
We have the following expression:
(6.34 x 10 ^ -7) (4.5 x 10 ^ 3)
The solution shown is:
(6.34 x 10 ^ -7) (4.5 x 10 ^ 3)
(6.34 x 4.5) (10 ^ -7 x 10 ^ 3)
28.53 x 10 ^ -4
-28.53 x 10 ^ 4
-2.853 x 10 ^ 3
The errors are:
A. He changed the sign of the coefficient. A negative exponent does not affect the sign of a coefficient in scientific notation. The sign of the exponent determines the direction the decimal is moved in.
D. He got the wrong value for the coefficients; 28.53 x 10^-4 is not possible. The coefficients in scientific notation are always greater than 1, but less than 10.
It is 8 because you would do 9x8=72