<em>The type of figurative language represented by the use of the word Selma in the provided stanza is allusion.
</em>
<em>Allusion </em>is a brief and indirect reference to a person, place, thing or idea of historical, cultural, literary or political significance, in this particular case the 1965 civil rights march from Selma, Alabama, in which nonviolent protestors were attacked by police. Allusions are just passing comments about which the writer expects the reader to possess enough knowledge to noticeits importance in a text.
<em>The use of such figurative language affects the last line of this particular stanza by providung a description</em>. Even though the descriptions referred to persons or things in allusions are not fully detailed, its use enables writers or poets to simplify complex ideas and emotions.
<em />
B. It was an awesome party. Thanks for coming, man. It is been utilized informally to call the person, "man".
<h3>What is casual tone?</h3>
The audience for a casual tone of voice exists practically anybody. It is usually adjusted to the age group and society for whom the message or content is intended. It usually gives a pun or a joke, as if there exists a friendly conversation going on the highway corner or by the office coffee machine.
The casual style manages to accommodate the culture of the speaker in communication so it will be comfortable to be understood. Students also can utilize the utterances in their daily vitality because most of the utterances exist familiar to them.
The casual speech style exists as a style of speaking that stands warm, friendly, easygoing, informal, and often uses slang. In casual communication, the speaker exists satisfied and at ease. The listener is concentrated on the speaker's message rather than how they communicate it.
Hence, B. It was an awesome party. Thanks for coming, man. It is been utilized informally to call the person, "man".
To learn more about casual tone refer to:
brainly.com/question/10021265
#SPJ4
Answer: I think the answer is b
Explanation:
A mistaken belief, especially one based on unsound argument.
I hate when people do this, explain what the scene is and be more specific.
