Answer:
valid.
Explanation:
Valid is something effective, legally binding or able to withstand objection.
In deductive reasoning, an argument is valid if and only if it takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion nevertheless to be false. It is not required for a valid argument to have premises that are actually true, but to have premises that, if they were true, would guarantee the truth of the argument's conclusion. Valid arguments must be clearly expressed by means of sentences called well-formed formulas. The validity of an argument can be tested, proved or disproved, and depends on its logical form.
An argument is a set of statements expressing the premises and an evidence-based conclusion.
Answer: unfinished question?
Explanation:
In social studies, especially those in which you want to analyze or investigate the behavior, in many cases recreating the situation to be studied in a laboratory or the interaction of the researcher with the subject under investigation may be impossible or alter the result leading to false conclusions In these cases, the researcher resorts to naturalistic observation, which consists of observing or studying the subject in their natural conditions, in their environment, thus avoiding a change in the behavior of the researched, either because of the artificial nature of the experiment or because of the presence of a stranger, the researcher, in the environment.
Answer
In this case, the use of another method such as an interview or survey can result in a change of behavior or response by the interviewee, thus observing and recording the number of visitors without intervening with them is making a <em>naturalistic observation</em>
Hippocrates was a free resident of greek.
Answer:
I don't really understand what ur question is
