1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
RSB [31]
3 years ago
7

What two important military appointments were given to Eisenhower?

History
2 answers:
yKpoI14uk [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

  • Supreme Commander of Allied forces in the Europe
  • Supreme Commander of NATO forces in Europe

Explanation:

General Dwight David Eisenhower was military officer who was known for his prowess in war organization and strategy. he served as the 34th president of the united states of America from 1953 to 1961 during the world war II he was appointed the commander of the allied forces in Europe in the fight against Germany.

General Dwight David Eisenhower was also appointed the supreme commander of the NATO forces in Europe in 1951 shortly after the world war II These military appointments were the most important military appointments Eisenhower received.

Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Supreme Commander of Allied forces in the Pacific

Supreme Commander of NATO forces in Europe

Explanation:

Major General Dwight D. Eisenhower was an army officer known for his talent of organization and strategy. He was made to lead the U.S forces in their fight against Germany.

You might be interested in
What is the most likely cause of the deposits of salt, gypsum, and limestone in Oklahoma?
Dennis_Churaev [7]

Answer:

b from ancient oceans

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare and contrast the encomienda system and slavery. Tell how they were similar and how they were different. Respond in at le
marysya [2.9K]

The encomienda system posed a requirement of a group of individuals to give back to another in work, kind or otherwise, in exchange for a good received. It was established that a person who received the legal right to be an encomendero, had at his disposal a village of Indians with his caciques to pay him tribute and to serve him. In return, the Indians received "protection", that is to say, the encomendero had to take care of the well-being of the natives in the spiritual and in the earthly thing, assuring its maintenance and its protection, as well as its Christian indoctrination (evangelization).

The figure of the cacique or main character of the towns was very important because he used to be the intermediary between the encomendero and the Indians. The population was supposed to pay the Crown so the caciques collected the valuable things from their population and gave them to the encomendero.

 This system differs from slavery inasmuch as it is considered as a system of exchanges where both parties give something in exchange for receiving something, in slavery there is no guarantee of anything to people, and they are only subjected to doing things for the sake of force. However, the encomienda has resembled slavery or has derived in it, since there have been abuses where forced labor, mistreatment and other things to the indigenous people ended up being imposed. On the other hand, encomienda as well as slavery is a system imposed. Another similarity is that the natives had to serve the encomendero, his family or whom they wanted to serve, in a mandatory manner. Also, both in the system of entrustment as in slavery, the people subjected do not have liberties, in the system of encomiendas you do not have the freedom to choose not to pay the crown since it is established as a duty and obligation, as well as they lose their freedom by being under the orders of the encomendero. In slavery, people also can not choose and must follow orders. But it should be mentioned that in the encomienda Indians could be entrusted for a maximum of 2 years, could not establish a perpetuity as dictated by the crown, different from the people subjected to slavery that were considered a more "economic" labor, they were forced to perform tasks under someone's command for indefinite periods, that is, there was a perpetuity of slavery that lasted as long as the person submitting them wanted, since in slavery one person (the master) takes over another ( the slave).

I hope that it can help you! Regards.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Drag each tile to the correct box. Not all tiles will be used. Place the events leading to the Iran Hostage Crisis in chronologi
marishachu [46]

The chronological order of events lead to Iran Hostage Crisis are-

  1. US-backed overthrow of Prime Minister Mossadegh.
  2. Visits between President Carter and the Shah of Iran.
  3. Iranian revolution, led by Ayatollah Khomeini.
  4. Admittance of the Shah of Iran to the United States for medical treatment.
<h3>What was Iran Hostage Crisis?</h3>

In the international crisis known as the Iran Captive Crisis (1979–1981), Iranian terrorists abducted 66 Americans from the American embassy in Tehran and held 52 of those hostage for much more than a year.

Some key features regarding the Iran Hostage Crisis are-

  • The crisis, which occurred in the tumultuous years after the Pahlavi monarchy's collapse by Iran's Islamic Revolution (1978–79), had a significant impact on internal politics in the US and ruined relations between that country and Iran for decades.
  • The relationship between Iran and the United States was significantly impacted after the Iranian revolution.
  • As Iran hostage crisis occurred just after the Vietnam War, it dealt a serious damage to American morale and prestige.
  • In addition to impeding U.S.-Iranian ties, it was widely thought to have played a role in Carter's loss to Reagan with in 1980 presidential election.
  • In addition, rumors surfaced also that Reagan campaign interfered with Carter's efforts to reach an early agreement, derailing a potential electoral triumph for the Carter campaign, in order to assure a Reagan victory, in the years that followed the crisis.
  • That argument has, however, mostly been refuted.

To know more about Iran Hostage Crisis, here

brainly.com/question/2089850

#SPJ4

6 0
2 years ago
The death of prithviraj chauhan led to the end of the Rajput rule in india. Justify this statement
Snowcat [4.5K]

ANSWER: Prithviraj Chauhan was a Rajput Indian king of the Chauhan dynasty who ruled from 1178 to 1192 CE. He was a ruler of the present day states of Rajasthan, Punjab, Haryana and Delhi of India. He achieved various military successes against several Hindu kingdoms. He also defeated Muhammad of Ghori who was a ruler of Islamic Ghurid Dynasty. The Muhammad of Ghori reverted back with an attack in 1192 CE with the second battle of Tarain where Prithviraj Chauhan was defeated and it laid the foundation of Islamic conquest in India.

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was a pre-Columbian Mound Builder culture?
likoan [24]

Answer:

C: the Adena

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Many african americans supported marcus garvey because they liked the idea of:
    11·2 answers
  • Treason is a federal crime that can _____.
    14·1 answer
  • Mercantilism limited trade during the age of exploration European economies grew rapidly during this period largely because of
    8·2 answers
  • Egyptian pharaoh who built one-half of all surviving egyptian monuments
    12·1 answer
  • Between Egypt,Babylon,Assyria and Persia,which civilization was the most developed? And in what order from the most highly devel
    10·1 answer
  • Why was it important that civil service positions were not hereditary?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following factors contributed to the success of the commercial revolution in Europe
    14·1 answer
  • I need help plzzzzzzzz
    13·1 answer
  • PLS ANSWER QUICKLY!!!!!! ITS DUE SOON!!!!!!!!
    9·1 answer
  • Along what river is Tulsa located?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!