C. to serve as funeral homes
Answer:
Hitler used the concept of nationalism to join all the German people from different nations in its neighboring countries.
Explanation:
After the first World War, Germany forced to sign the Treaty of Versailles, which somewhat shattered the country in every aspect. The German Empire was broken in portions and formed into other countries.
Some of these countries became Czechoslovakia (Sudetenland), Silesia, Poland, etc. These areas had a large German population in them, and they somewhat lost their jobs. In the 1930's Hitler used the term nationalism in Eastern Europe to join all Germans together with land, which once was part of the German Empire. He invaded Czechoslovakia and towards western portions of Poland. Nazi used the slogan called Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer.
Ultimately all this did not conclude as a good sign for the British and France, and at last, they declared war on Nazi Germany.
Answer:
Answering the question "How was the issue of slavery addressed in the U.S Constitution" is a little tricky because the words "slave" or "slavery" were not used in the original Constitution, and the word "slavery" is very hard to find even in the current Constitution. However, the issues of the rights of enslaved people, its related trade and practice, in general, have been addressed in several places of the Constitution; namely, Article I, Articles IV and V and the 13th Amendment, which was added to the Constitution nearly 80 years after the signing of the original document. However, slavery had been tacitly protected in the original Constitution through clauses such as the Three-Fifths Compromise, in which three-fifths of the slave population was counted for representation in the United States House of Representatives.
Explanation:
When the Constitution was made in 1787, slavery was a powerful institution and such a heated topic at the Constitutional Convention. The majority of disagreements came when the representatives from slave-holding states felt their "peculiar" institution was being threatened. James Madison, the Father of the Constitution and a slave owner, opposed the pro-slavery delegates and went on to say it would be, "wrong to admit in the Constitution the idea that there could be property in men." He didn't believe that slavery should be justified by federal law. Once the Constitution was ratified, slavery was never mentioned by name. Shouldn't this be obvious support that the Constitution did not support slavery? Not exactly.
Disease played a very deadly role for the natives and a very helpful role for the British, since the natives were not immune to these diseases and many died upon contact.
They were forced to move B.