Yes. In the opinion of the court, Marshall declared Marbury was entitled to his commission, but that the Supreme Court didn't have original jurisdiction to issue the writ of mandamus Marbury requested.Marshall explicits stated Marbury would have to refile his case in a lower court first, then appeal to the Supreme Court if he failed to get relief at that level. Marbury never refiled his case.
I don’t know what timeline map you have, but it was for the expansion of American Democracy.
Answer:
The Nazi party’s policies were deliberately vague so they might appeal to as many people as possible. People of both right and moderate-left wing politics joined because they agreed with at least one of their policies:
an aim to abolish the "unfair punishment" of the Treaty of Versailles was popular with many Germans
promises of better pensions and increased employment appealed to the common man and many traditional socialists
opposition to communism led many landowners and businessmen to support the Nazis – they were seen as the only credible right-wing alternative to the left-wing parties.
belief in the supremacy of the German race appealed to nationalists.
paramilitary groups reminded people of the comradeship they shared as soldiers during World War One
the promise to re-militarise Germany would bring in huge industrial contracts – bringing support from many industrialists
Hitler's hatred of Jews struck a chord with many people - they were a convenient scapegoat for all Germany's problems
Explanation:
Answer:
Judicial review allows the Supreme Court to take an active role in ensuring that the other branches of government abide by the constitution.
Actions taken during WW1 helped to promote ethnic unity and destabilise the region for the next century.
As Lawrence of Arabia encouraged the Bedouin tribes to fight against the Ottoman Empire, he tried to provoke nationalism in the ethnicities living in the Empire at the time, for example, Syrians and Arabs. He encouraged them to fight for their freedom and promised an independent nation for those minorities in the Empire.
The Sykes-Picot agreement destabilised the region and broke the promises made by Britain and France for an independent nation for the Arabs, Syrians, Bedouins etc. They split the Middle East in accordance to their colonial spheres of influence and occupied different parts of the Middle East, the borders created caused anger and outrage for some, eg Israel-Palestine.
