Answer:
Secondary appraisal
Explanation:
A secondary appraisal is a cognitive process that is happened when someone is looking out for how to cope up with the stressful situation. In this process, a person will find out how many options are there to cope up with the situation. In a stressful event, a person tries to find out the option and evaluate it. On the other hand, a threatening event allows for collecting information about the event.
Thus here in the above situation, Laslie is engaged in the secondary appraisal.
Answer:
The answer is
→ <u><em>comorbidity</em></u>
Explanation:
The paces of <u><em>comorbidity</em></u> among tension issues are high since they share the normal highlights of uneasiness and frenzy.
Hope this helped! :^)
The correct answer is A) Imprisonment of political dissidents rarely ends opposition to the government.
The conclusion that is best supported by this cartoon is "Imprisonment of political dissidents rarely ends opposition to the government."
This has been shown in many civil rights movements around the world. The government thinks that putting in jail the heads of any civil rights movement would be enough to stop the movement or a revolt. But in most cases, this is not the truth. On the contrary, when the leader is jailed, automatically it becomes a martyr, and its followers have a stronger reason to fight for. This was the case of Nelson Mandela and the South African people. After so many years in prison, Mandela left jail to become the President of South Africa.
Answer:
4. consequences
Explanation:
<u>This is a part of the four-step program to develop assertiveness and successful assertive script. </u>
<u>Providing rewards and punishments for implementing change is step four. It includes providing rewarding consequences for yourself once you manage to be more assertive, and when you include the other three steps from the program (describing the unwanted behavior, expressing your feelings and specifying the change that is needed for you). </u>
The consequences are for a person who is changing, but also the other person towards whom they are not assertive enough.
These consequences need to be explicit, include the positive rewards that are big enough to maintain the change, but also the punishments that you are willing to carry out and that are fitting the behavior. Don't exaggerate, be unrealistic, offer what you can't deliver or only carry out punishments.
