1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
elixir [45]
3 years ago
12

CASCA. Indeed they say the senators tomorrow

English
2 answers:
soldi70 [24.7K]3 years ago
7 0

The best analysis of the casual relationship in the given scene is “This decision will cause Cassius to act on his plans more urgently”

Answer: Option C

<u>Explanation:</u>

The given part in the question has been taken from the Scene 3 of the Act 1 of the Tragedy of Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare, where Casca and Cassius were in casual conversation.

The conversation was about the making of the King, for which Julius Caesar was to be crowned by the Senate, tomorrow. The decision so made by the Senate would let the plans of Cassius go in vain, and as to put his words into action, he had to act in haste.

katrin2010 [14]3 years ago
6 0

This decision will cause Cassius to act on his plans more urgently.

Answer: Option C.

<u>Explanation:</u>

In the story "The tragedy of Julius Caesar", Casca said that he wanted to stop the tyranny and he said that the people of Rome are very coward. They have got not courage in them to stop the tyranny of Caesar becoming the king so he will only have to take some action from stopping this to happen.

Since he did not want Caesar to become the king and he heard that the people are going to crown Caesar tomorrow to become the king in Italy, so he thought he had to take some action fast and in an urgent manner if he wanted to stop this tyranny from happening. He planned to murder him so that he could save people from taking such a stupid action of crowning Caesar.

You might be interested in
Text:
Bess [88]

Answer: In the first paragraph, the narraraor seeks to establish his credibility,  as if he expects the reader to believe that his especially acute sense of hearing makes him more believable than an ordinary observer. The narrarator purports that his calm, detailed account will be accepted as truthful, despite some irrational decisions and actions. The narrarator's attention to detail clues the reader to "expect the unexpected" in terms of details the narrator's heightened senses reveal.

In the third paragraph, the narrator reveals that he has, in fact, killed the old man. We are hearing the account of a murderer rationalizing his actions, as if this is what anyone with his keen perception and ability to carry out this elelaborate scheme would have done. The reader realizes that this narrator is crazy, but we are still listening, but we can intrpret his intentions as absolutely irrational. Speaking corageously to the man by day, sneaking stealthily into his bedroom by night.

The fourth paragraph confirms the reader's suspicions that the narator is beyond belief: feeling the extent of his own powers. And even when he thinks the old man may have heard him, he persists in his incredibly slow, deliberate intention to intrude into the man's bedroom-- hoping to see  what he has defined as Evil Eye-- as if the narrator has a duty to eliminate something that vexes only him. Our impression must be that this narrator can't escape the consequences of his actions.

3 0
3 years ago
I MET a traveller from an antique land
Advocard [28]
The answer is b JSU’s is usually
3 0
3 years ago
How was breaking a canon law different from breaking a governmental law during the Middle Ages?
Katen [24]

Answer:

How did canon law differ from governmental law? -Specific laws governed individual behavior. -Everyone was expected to obey the law. -The law included various beliefs of the Church.

Explanation:

How did canon law differ from governmental law?

-Specific laws governed individual behavior.

-Everyone was expected to obey the law.

-The law included various beliefs of the Church.

-Wrongdoers were punished for breaking the law.

5 0
2 years ago
Read the following passage. Which sound device is expressed by the bolded words?
AnnyKZ [126]
Sounds like rhyme. Alliteration is having the same letter start for each word- eg "Peter Piper picked a peck of pickled peppers"
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why does the poet most likely include this allusion to C.S. Lewis’s book The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe?
vekshin1

Answer:

The poet most likely includes this allusion to help show that books were a source of comfort and imagination for the speaker.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the minor characters in Fahrenheit 451?
    9·1 answer
  • Research question: Has the number of teenagers who experience cyberbullying increased? Which search terms are the most effective
    15·2 answers
  • If “What I Hope to Leave Behind” was the subject of a class discussion, why might paraphrasing this sentence be helpful? You cou
    15·2 answers
  • Izzy has 2 friends that are arguing what dose she do dose choses a side or breake it up
    12·1 answer
  • Me need help with this ty ty
    11·1 answer
  • Which quotation is a statement of fact?
    15·1 answer
  • When frankenstien comes alive what did clerval describe him as?
    11·2 answers
  • How does Medea see herself at the beginning of the play? How does Medea see herself at the end of the play?
    7·1 answer
  • ILL MARK AS BRAINLESS. What is the central idea of this article of Loss of culturally cattle leave Dinka Adrift?
    15·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of argumentative text?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!