1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GaryK [48]
3 years ago
10

If a person was sufficiently intoxicated to lack the mental capacity to comprehend the legal consequences of entering into the c

ontract, the contract may be voidable at the option of the intoxicated person. If, despite intoxication, the person understood these legal consequences, the contract will be enforceable.1. True2. False
Business
2 answers:
kenny6666 [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The correct answer is True.

Explanation:

When an intoxicated person enters into a contract, the contract can either be enforceable, meaning held to the fullest extent of the law, or voidable by the intoxicated person. The court will look at two criteria that need to be present in order to make the contract voidable:

  • The intoxication was severe enough that the person entering into the contract was incapacitated.
  • The other party was aware of the intoxication at the time.

A voidable contract, in this instance, is one in which the intoxicated party can end the agreement under certain terms. To expand on the criteria above, in order for the intoxicated person to void the contract, there needs to be adequate proof that one of the following occurred:

  • The intoxicated person consumed enough alcohol or drugs to cause impairment in thinking sufficient enough that he could not understand the legal ramifications of entering into the contract.
  • The other party to the contract knew of the intoxication.
Jlenok [28]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

1) True

Explanation:

An intoxicated person can either:

  1. disaffirm the contract: an intoxicated person can void a contract while still being intoxicated or short after becoming sober. If the contract involves basic necessities, it can still be voided but the intoxicated person is still liable for the goods or services consumed.
  2. ratify the contract: once sober the person can ratify the contract and it becomes enforceable by all the parties.

You might be interested in
Do It! Review 11-3a Incorrect answer. Your answer is incorrect. Try again. Riverbed Corp has 3,300 shares of 7%, $103 par value
harina [27]

Answer and Explanation:

1. The preferred stock is non-cumulative, and in previous years, the company has not skipped any dividends.

Dividend paid to preferred shareholders = Shares × Par value preferred stock × Shares percentage

= 3300 × $103 × 7%

= $23,793

Dividend paid to common shareholders = Cash dividend - Dividend paid to preferred shareholders

= $123,500 - $23,793

= $99,707

2. The preferred stock is non-cumulative, and in both of the two previous years, the company did not pay a dividend.

Dividend paid to preferred shareholders = Shares × Par value preferred stock × Shares percentage

= 3300 × $103 × 7%

= $23,793

Dividend paid to common shareholders = Cash dividend - Dividend paid to preferred shareholders

= $123,500 - $23,793

= $99,707

3. The preferred stock is cumulative, and in both of the two previous years the company did not pay a dividend.

Dividend paid to preferred shareholders =  Shares × Par value preferred stock × Shares percentage × Number of years

= 3,300 × $103 × 7% × 3

= $71,379

Dividend paid to common shareholders = Cash dividend - Dividend paid to preferred shareholders

= $123,500 - $71,379

= $52,121

5 0
3 years ago
Briefly define and give a specific example of:A.1.Scale economies in connection with urban economics (i.e., related to land use,
Shtirlitz [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

.1.Scale economies in connection with urban economics (i.e., related to land use,housing, or firm location)A.2.Pecuniary agglomeration economiesA.3.Technological agglomeration economiesA.4.Retail agglomeration economiesA.5.ExternalitiesA.6.ceteris paribus assumptionA.7.A numeraire goodA.8.An efficient allocation of resources

7 0
4 years ago
Accepting a good-quality lot would be a _____.
fredd [130]

Accepting a good-quality lot would be a <u><em>correct decision.</em></u>

OPTION B "correct decision" is the right answer according to Acceptance Sampling model.

Utilized in quality assurance, acceptance sampling is a statistical method for measuring the reliability of a product or service. It enables a business to ascertain a batch's quality by randomly sampling from it. The standard of quality for the whole set of products will be assumed to be equal to that of the selected sample.

It is impossible for a corporation to constantly test every single one of its goods. It's possible there are too many to inspect efficiently or cheaply. Extensive testing could also compromise the product's quality or render it unmarketable. If a representative sample were tested, the results would be accurate without jeopardizing the rest of the production run.

Acceptance sampling is a method of quality control in which a representative sample of a product batch is tested and its quality is inferred from the results. Acceptance sampling is useful for quality control when implemented properly.

To know more about Acceptance sampling refer to:

brainly.com/question/28192251

#SPJ4

5 0
2 years ago
Which of the following is true about mortgage-backed securities? I) They aggregate individual home mortgages into homogeneous po
quester [9]

Answer:

I ,II and IV

Explanation:

Mortgage backed securities are either a claim for equity in a pool of mortgages, or a duty secured by a pool. Such claims reflect home loan securities. Loans borrow from mortgage lenders and then sell bundles of those loans on the resale market.

Specifically, once those loans are paid off, they sell their claim to the mortgage cash inflows. The issuer of the mortgage needs to maintain the loan, receiving principal and interest payments, and transfers those payments on to the mortgage borrower.

Therefore according to the given situation the correct answer is I, II, IV

6 0
3 years ago
Which is the best measurement to use to determine who might have the absolute advantage?
Makovka662 [10]

Answer:

<u>low opportunity cost</u>

Explanation:

<u>Opportunity cost</u> is described as a process in which an individual sacrifices something when they tend to choose one thing or option over another option or thing.

<u>Low opportunity cost: </u>The term "low opportunity cost" is determined as the possibility of an individual's chosen investment returns to be lower than the forgone investment's returns.

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • The biweekly taxable wages for the employees of rite shop follow. Compute the FICA taxes for each employee and the employers FIC
    10·1 answer
  • Smiling Elephant, Inc., has an issue of preferred stock outstanding that pays a $5.60 dividend every year, in perpetuity. If thi
    13·1 answer
  • Using High-Low to Calculate Predicted Total Variable Cost and Total Cost for a Time Period that Differs from the Data Period
    9·1 answer
  • Manuel has plans to go to a movie and already has a $10 nonrefundable, nonexchangeable, and nontransferable ticket. Now Poornima
    15·1 answer
  • Olinick Corporation is considering a project that would require an investment of $324,000 and would last for 8 years. The increm
    14·1 answer
  • If the quantity demanded for a good rises as the price falls, then the curve representing this relationship will be:
    5·1 answer
  • Cookies refer to:_______
    5·1 answer
  • What is the function of a 3-compartment sink?
    8·1 answer
  • how long will it take 13,000 to grow to 18,000 if the investment earns at the interest rate of 3% compunded monthly
    5·1 answer
  • Businesses use a number of methods to gather information and create a good picture of their customer base. This ________ can hel
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!