1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
s2008m [1.1K]
4 years ago
5

Which of the following best describes Theodore Roosevelt as president?

History
2 answers:
KIM [24]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

C. Outgoing and decisive is the correct answer.

Explanation:

  • Outgoing and decisive best describes Theodore Roosevelt as president.
  • Theodore Roosevelt was the twenty-sixth President of the United States.
  • He was a strong, energetic, innovative, helpful and politely confident, excellent decision-maker, effective, and intelligent.
  • That's the reason outgoing and decisive"  describe him as president.
  • He used several steps and changes in the US to make it a powerful nation.
  • He developed the operation of national parklands and forests.
goblinko [34]4 years ago
5 0
A. He passed power to Congress.
You might be interested in
Why did the union lose?
tatuchka [14]

Answer:

Because tactically the defense had the advantage, and the Union was generally on the offense.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The acting out of a religious service helped the uneducated members of the congregation understand the meaning. True False User:
MA_775_DIABLO [31]

True.  Acting out the service helps people understand the meaning.  The masses were mostly uneducated and the best way for them to understand the service is through acting.  The answer is also true.  The reason is also the same so that people can understand the message of the play.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The name of the powerful military force in the Ottoman Empire was
Aleksandr [31]
  the name <span>of the powerful military force in the Ottoman Empire were the </span>Janissary Corps
5 0
3 years ago
What differences existed between the development of eastern and Western Europe
Tcecarenko [31]
The slow pace of industrialization, diluted national/cultural identities, and Communism.
Eastern European countries were formed, in the shape we know them today, mostly after the collapse of the Ottoman and Russian empires and the treaty of Versailles following the first world war.

Most of these countries' territories had long been disputed by the great powers in Europe (Austria-Hungary, Russia, the Ottomans), while their inhabitants had few rights, or opportunities, to rise out of the agricultural sustenance in which the majority were living. As a result, there were poles of modernity in some of the capital cities while the rest of the country would be politically and economically isolated.

Industrialization was slow to reach these places, hence the increase in the standards of living associated with countries where industry accelerated the pace of economies and the stagnation in Eastern Europe. Slow, however, does not mean inexistent.

The final nail in the coffin for Eastern European countries were the post WWII communist governments. While the economies of countries like Romania were comparable to Spain or Portugal before the war, communism effectively held back any hope that progress could be made. Communist governments were preoccupied with quotas for products that were often not needed on the market, with ideological education -as opposed to useful education - and with a cold war they had no chance of ever winning.

Once the iron curtain fell, the whole world was able to see how Communism ruined entire countries with poor planning, corrupt practices, and generations of people who were unable to think or create wealth for themselves without resorting to theft or other forms of corruption.

Most of Eastern Europe today is long past the rural, pre industrialized era where large regional powers dictated their fates, but the Communist legacy and mentality is still going strong, as demonstrated by their deeply corrupt and inefficient governments.


4 0
4 years ago
Did violence and mistreatment of African Americans accelerate or limit the Great Migration?
Aliun [14]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why are dictatorships and monarchies considered autocratic political systems
    8·2 answers
  • Which explains why women were able to find new job opportunities during World War II?
    6·2 answers
  • What makes a place a civilization?​
    5·1 answer
  • Will give brainliest!!!!!!!!!!
    14·2 answers
  • Which two international organizations most help developing countries? the IMF and the WTO the WTO and the G20 the IMF and the Wo
    6·2 answers
  • Jovial in a sentence
    14·1 answer
  • LIKE PWEZ HELP!!!!!!!!<br><br> Name 2 types of information that an architect collects for a project.
    7·1 answer
  • Mutiple choice pls answer
    8·2 answers
  • Following the financial panic in 1929, the government created the __________ in order to insure bank deposits.
    13·2 answers
  • How does the ethnic balance in the United States today differ from that of colonial times
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!