Marta is making an argument for a job candidate she likes. she tells the other members of the hiring committee that all utsa graduates are trained in a <u>syllogism</u>.
A syllogism is a form of logical argument that applies deductive reasoning to arrive at an end primarily based on propositions that are asserted or assumed to be real.
In its earliest form, syllogism arises whilst two true premises (propositions or statements) validly imply a conclusion or the principle point that the argument objectives to get across.
For instance, knowing that everyone guys are mortal (primary premise) and that Socrates is a person (minor premise), we might also validly conclude that Socrates is mortal. Syllogistic arguments are commonly represented in a 3-line form.
Learn more about syllogism here: brainly.com/question/361872
#SPJ4
“Crime” is not a phenomenon that can be defined according to any objective set of criteria. Instead, what a particular state, legal regime, ruling class or collection of dominant social forces defines as “crime” in any specific society or historical period will reflect the political, economic and cultural interests of such forces. By extension, the interests of competing political, economic or cultural forces will be relegated to the status of “crime” and subject to repression,persecution and attempted subjugation. Those activities of an economic, cultural or martial nature that are categorized as “crime” by a particular system of power and subjugation will be those which advance the interests of the subjugated and undermine the interests of dominant forces. Conventional theories of criminology typically regard crime as the product of either “moral” failing on the part of persons labeled as “criminal,” genetic or biological predispositions towards criminality possessed by such persons, “social injustice” or“abuse” to which the criminal has previously been subjected, or some combination of these. (Agnew and Cullen, 2006) All of these theories for the most part regard the “criminal as deviant” perspective offered by established interests as inherently legitimate, though they may differ in their assessments concerning the matter of how such “deviants” should be handled. The principal weakness of such theories is their failure to differentiate the problem of anti-social or predatory individual behavior<span> per se</span><span> from the matter of “crime” as a political, legal, economic and cultural construct. All human groups, from organized religions to outlaw motorcycle clubs, typically maintain norms that disallow random or unprovoked aggression by individuals against other individuals within the group, and a system of penalties for violating group norms. Even states that have practiced genocide or aggressive war have simultaneously maintained legal prohibitions against “common” crimes. Clearly, this discredits the common view of the state’s apparatus of repression and control (so-called “criminal justice systems”) as having the protection of the lives, safety and property of innocents as its primary purpose.</span>
Answer:
Social
Explanation:
When children hear about their races negatively, they can get discouraged to go to public areas, affecting their social development.
