Answer:
B) Congress did not have a standing military to enforce the laws.
Explanation:
Answer:
No. In an 8-1 decision authored by Chief Justice Morrison Waite, the Court concluded that the relevant sections of the Enforcement Act lacked the necessary, limiting language to qualify as enforcement of the Fifteenth Amendment. The Chief Justice first stated that the Fifteenth Amendment "does not confer the right of suffrage upon any one," but "prevents the States, or the United States, however, from giving preference…to one citizen of the United States over another on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude." In examining the language of the Enforcement Act, the Court noted that, while the first two sections of the act explicitly referred to race in criminalizing interference with the right to vote, the relevant third and fourth sections refer only to the "aforesaid" offense. According to the Court, this language does not sufficiently tailor the law to qualify as "appropriate legislation" under the Enforcement Clause of the Fifteenth Amendment.
Explanation:
Answer:
Option B.
Explanation:
The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, is the right answer.
Delivered on 8th December 1941 by the then U.S. President, Franklin D. Roosevelt, the Infamy Speech was an address to a Joint Session of the Congress of the United States. It was delivered on the very next day of the attack of Japan on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii and the announcement of Japanese for the combat on the U.S. and Britain. Accordingly, the speech is popularly regarded as the "Pearl Harbor Speech".
Http://www.theday.com/article/20120628/NWS01/307019996
Answer:
Andrés Manuel López Obrador
Explanation:
