1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tiny-mole [99]
3 years ago
14

A state legislator wants to amend the Articles of Confederation. How many states would have to agree in order for the amendment

to pass?
History
2 answers:
inn [45]3 years ago
8 0

Under the Articles of Confederation, all 13 states must agree in order for an amendment to pass.

The Articles of Confederation was America's first constitution after becoming independent from Great Britain. This constitution gave the federal government very little power, as Americans feared a strong central government like the one they experienced underneath British control.

With this in mind, the Articles of Confederation was developed so that states had a significant amount of power. Along with this, the Articles of Confederation made it difficult for the federal government to implement new laws. This is why it took all 13 states to add an amendment to the Articles of Confederation.

KIM [24]3 years ago
6 0

Thirty eight states must need to agree to amend the articles of confederation. This is clearly stated in Article V of the Constitution of the United States where two thirds of both houses shall deem the amendment if it is necessary and when a convention is made three fourths of the legislature shall ratify the amendments laid on the table.

<span>There are a total of 50 states in the US you multiply that with ¾ of the said states in the constitution you’ll get 37.5 votes (i.e. 38 states required).</span>

You might be interested in
What presidential action during the civil war contributed most to ending slavery after the war?
wlad13 [49]

Answer:

d

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why might appointing supporters as a reward, instead of based on merit, detrimental to governing?
kotykmax [81]

Answer:

It will surely be detrimental to governing.

Explanation:

A supported who is appointed as a reward might not have the qualities needed like that of someone appointed based on merit thereby causing problems.

5 0
3 years ago
What is NOT a right in the declaration of independence
hichkok12 [17]
The answer is C. Capitalism.
4 0
2 years ago
Explain one way in which people's reactions to the plague were similar in the fourteenth and the seventeenth century?
Luda [366]
Plague is a deadly disease that people are afraid of.
5 0
3 years ago
'S
Lapatulllka [165]

Answer:

Reformation

Explanation:

It's the corrrect answer because the Renaissance is after the reformation

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe the events that unfolded at the second continental congress and identify its major achievement.
    10·1 answer
  • What problems did the united states experince with spain and great britian
    13·1 answer
  • What is the risk of having a dynamic rather than a constitutive defense response?
    6·1 answer
  • Which best defines the concept of popular sovereignty?
    15·2 answers
  • Here is a scenario please determine how best to handle this situation. Note the patient can be anyone you choose when answering
    5·1 answer
  • During the Gilded Age what were the primary complaints of farmers?
    12·1 answer
  • Talk to me lets have a convo
    6·1 answer
  • Poem is (do not go into the good night )please help
    7·1 answer
  • What is the answer<br><br> Please please help me
    7·1 answer
  • Correct the sentences below.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!