The Emancipation Proclamation declared slavery wrong
Answer:
It is simplistic to describe history as "what happened in the past" because it's is not just an accumulation of facts. History goes beyond examining the records of events that have occurred.
It also involves studying to know why those events occurred. When the why is understood, then learning takes place and knowledge gained can be used to repeat and improve upon successes whilst preventing and or correcting mishaps.
This is important because the future is an accumulation of past and present occurrences.
Cheers!
Answer:
Missouri’s bid to become the first state west of the Mississippi River, and to allow slavery within its borders, set off a bitter debate in a Congress that was already divided into pro- and anti-slavery factions. During the debate, Rep. James Tallmadge of New York proposed an amendment to the statehood bill that would have eventually ended slavery in Missouri and set the existing enslaved workers there free. Southerners who opposed the Missouri Compromise did so because it set a precedent for Congress to make laws concerning slavery, while Northerners disliked the law because it meant slavery was expanded into new territory. Sorry I can't list everything this was an essay that I don't have anymore I'm just going off the top of my head.
Explanation:
Land could be cleared quickly and enriched with ash from the fires
Answer: The Apartheid Movement that happened in South Africa was very similar to the Civil Rights Movement in the U.S. Apartheid means the separateness by racial factors. This event took place in the 1930s and was also.
Explanation:
https://marcelenastephens.wordpress.com/2012/05/02/civil-rights-movement-and-apartheid-compare-and-contrast/
