1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kati45 [8]
3 years ago
12

In his inaugural address on March 4, 1845 James K. Polk said, “The world has nothing to fear from military ambition in our Gover

nment.” In what ways did Polk’s presidency reflect this statement? In what ways did it not reflect this statement? Explain your answer in a well-constructed essay that includes specific details in support of your position.
History
2 answers:
Colt1911 [192]3 years ago
8 0
<span>James K. Polk's statement foreshadowed his reign and capture of the two states; territories that didn't belong to him. His presidency reflected the statement he gave and he is often thought of as the worst president.</span>
NemiM [27]3 years ago
5 0

James K. Polk, the 11th president of the united states, cared to build his mandate on diplomatic expansionist as well as foreign affairs policies stated as soon as from his inaugural speech in 1845. One of his biggest accomplishments was the annexation of Texas as a state of the union.

Polk cared to disperse the belief that Texas rejoining the confederation meant <em>"the conquest of a nation seeking to extend her dominions by arms and violence"</em> as stated in his <u>1845 address.</u> On the same topic, he declared <em>“the world has nothing to fear from military ambition in our Government”</em>, to discourage foreign and national controversy over his intent.

The U.S. winning the Mexican-American war over Texas, controversy still remained strong over moral and economical cost for both flanks. Even after signing the <em>"Treaty of Peace, Friendship, Limits and Settlement between the United States of America and the Mexican Republic"</em> on July 4th 1848, opposing antiwar spheres such as a <u>Whig newspaper</u> sarcasticaly concluded <em>"We take nothing by conquest ... Thank God", to mean his office may not reflect the essence of his initial statements.</em>

There is no doubt the Mexican war represented major losses of life and prestige for Mexico over which Polk's original statement may not be reflected. Nevertheless, ulterior economical compensation for physical damage to Mexico and the offer of American citizenship for border-inhabiting Mexican citizens were positive reflections of his purpose during office as they offered an amicable truce to end the conflict.

You might be interested in
List two examples of innovations that Europeans borrowed from other cultures?
Sedbober [7]

This question was answered by  Skrskr1717  Ambitious  

papermaking, gunpowder, compass

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Tariff of 1828 continue to haunt Jackson's presidency?
Galina-37 [17]

Answer:The Tariff of Abominations was the name outraged southerners gave to a tariff passed in 1828. Residents of the South believed the tax on imports was excessive and unfairly targeted their region of the country.

The tariff, which became law in the spring of 1828, set very high duties on goods imported into the United States. And by doing so it did create major economic problems for the South. As the South was not a manufacturing center, it had to either import finished goods from Europe (primarily Britain) or buy goods made in the North.

Adding insult to injury, the law had obviously been devised to protect manufacturers in the Northeast. With a protective tariff essentially creating artificially high prices, the consumers in the South found themselves at a severe disadvantage when buying products from either Northern or foreign manufacturers.

The 1828 tariff created a further problem for the South, as it reduced business with England. And that, in turn, made it more difficult for the English to afford cotton grown in the American South.

Intense feeling about the Tariff of Abominations prompted John C. Calhoun to anonymously write essays setting forth his theory of nullification, in which he forcefully advocated that states could ignore federal laws. Calhoun's protest against the federal government eventually led to the Nullification Crisis.

Background of the 1828 Tariff

The Tariff of 1828 was one of a series of protective tariffs passed in America. After the War of 1812, when English manufacturers began to flood the American market with cheap goods that undercut and threatened new American industry, the U.S. Congress responded by setting a tariff in 1816. Another tariff was passed in 1824.

Those tariffs were designed to be protective, meaning they were intended to drive up the price of imported goods and thereby protect American factories from British competition. And they became unpopular in some quarters because the tariffs were always promoted originally as being temporary measures. Yet, as new industries emerged, new tariffs always seemed necessary to protect them from foreign competition.

The 1828 tariff actually came into being as part of a complicated political strategy designed to cause problems for President John Quincy Adams. Supporters of Andrew Jackson hated Adams following his victory in the "Corrupt Bargain" election of 1824.

The Jackson people drew up legislation with very high tariffs on imports necessary to both the North and South, on the assumption that the bill would not pass. And the president, it was assumed, would be blamed for the failure to pass the tariff bill. And that would cost him among his supporters in the Northeast.

The strategy backfired when the tariff bill passed in Congress on May 11, 1828. President John Quincy Adams signed it into law. Adams believed the tariff was a good idea and signed it though he realized it could hurt him politically in the upcoming election of 1828.

The new tariff imposed high import duties on iron, molasses, distilled spirits, flax, and various finished goods. The law was instantly unpopular, with people in different regions disliking parts of it, but the opposition was greatest in the South.

John C. Calhoun's Opposition to the Tariff of Abominations

The intense southern opposition to the 1828 tariff was led by John C. Calhoun, a dominating political figure from South Carolina. Calhoun had grown up on the frontier of the late 1700s, yet he had been educated at Yale College in Connecticut and also received legal training in New England.

In national politics, Calhoun had emerged, by the mid-1820s, as an eloquent and dedicated advocate for the South (and also for the institution of slavery, upon which the economy of the South depended).

Calhoun's plans to run for president had been thwarted by lack of support in 1824, and he wound up running for vice president with John Quincy Adams. So in 1828, Calhoun was actually the vice president of the man who signed the hated tariff into law.

Calhoun Published a Strong Protest Against the Tariff

In late 1828 Calhoun wrote an essay titled "South Carolina Exposition and Protest," which was anonymously published. In his essay Calhoun criticized the concept of a protective tariff, arguing that tariffs should only be used to raise revenue, not to artificially boost business in certain regions of the nation. And Calhoun called South Carolinians "serfs of the system," detailing how they were forced to pay higher prices for necessities.

Explanation: thancks

8 0
3 years ago
What struggles did african-americans face during the 1920s?
ElenaW [278]
African Americans were left out of the new prosperity 
7 0
3 years ago
France and Spain supported the colonists during the American Revolution by
defon
 ¨providing naval assistance¨<span>Hope this helps</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these were included in the SALT I treaty? Check all that apply.
amm1812

The correct answers are A) a cap on nuclear arms and D) a limit on launch sites.

<em>The options that were included in the SALT 1 treaty were a cap on nuclear arms and a limit on launch sites. </em>

The SALT 1 Treaty was signed on May 27, 1072, between the Soviet and the United States. SALT stands for “Strategic Arms Limitation Talks”. President Nixon and USRR leader Brezhnev agreed on limiting the fabrication of strategic missiles with nuclear weapons. It was the first intent to limit the arms race between the two nations.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the wheel make life easier?
    13·2 answers
  • How did the colonist react to battles of Lexington and concord?
    15·1 answer
  • The "star spangled banner" is most associated with which part of the war?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following events contributed to Joseph McCarthy’s rise to power during the early 1950s? The House Un-American Activ
    9·2 answers
  • Which of these was a goal shared by the knights of labor and the american federation of labor?
    13·2 answers
  • Which is an example of a citizen's responsibility
    7·2 answers
  • By the end of the war how many individuals been killed
    11·1 answer
  • Exam
    13·2 answers
  • In regards to religion what is the meaning of the excerpt
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following programs in Communist China built on a relationship with the West?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!