1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kati45 [8]
3 years ago
12

In his inaugural address on March 4, 1845 James K. Polk said, “The world has nothing to fear from military ambition in our Gover

nment.” In what ways did Polk’s presidency reflect this statement? In what ways did it not reflect this statement? Explain your answer in a well-constructed essay that includes specific details in support of your position.
History
2 answers:
Colt1911 [192]3 years ago
8 0
<span>James K. Polk's statement foreshadowed his reign and capture of the two states; territories that didn't belong to him. His presidency reflected the statement he gave and he is often thought of as the worst president.</span>
NemiM [27]3 years ago
5 0

James K. Polk, the 11th president of the united states, cared to build his mandate on diplomatic expansionist as well as foreign affairs policies stated as soon as from his inaugural speech in 1845. One of his biggest accomplishments was the annexation of Texas as a state of the union.

Polk cared to disperse the belief that Texas rejoining the confederation meant <em>"the conquest of a nation seeking to extend her dominions by arms and violence"</em> as stated in his <u>1845 address.</u> On the same topic, he declared <em>“the world has nothing to fear from military ambition in our Government”</em>, to discourage foreign and national controversy over his intent.

The U.S. winning the Mexican-American war over Texas, controversy still remained strong over moral and economical cost for both flanks. Even after signing the <em>"Treaty of Peace, Friendship, Limits and Settlement between the United States of America and the Mexican Republic"</em> on July 4th 1848, opposing antiwar spheres such as a <u>Whig newspaper</u> sarcasticaly concluded <em>"We take nothing by conquest ... Thank God", to mean his office may not reflect the essence of his initial statements.</em>

There is no doubt the Mexican war represented major losses of life and prestige for Mexico over which Polk's original statement may not be reflected. Nevertheless, ulterior economical compensation for physical damage to Mexico and the offer of American citizenship for border-inhabiting Mexican citizens were positive reflections of his purpose during office as they offered an amicable truce to end the conflict.

You might be interested in
Which statement best compares the legislative process at the federal and state levels of government​
Lilit [14]

Explanation:

Via the confirmation process, voters will oust politicians from office.

Wasn't at the national level, nor at the state level. The government departments. Power is split between the political, administrative and legislative assemblies.

4 0
3 years ago
HELPPPP!!!!! I'LL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND 70 POINTS!!!!
irina [24]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did the South fear would happen if the North had an increased number of representatives in the House of Representatives?
vlabodo [156]
The South feared that the if the North had more representatives, they would try to abolish slavery
7 0
3 years ago
What are the three main parts of the Hebrew bible and how do they differ?
Pie
<span>The Law. The Prophets. The Writings.The first consists of the 5 books ofMoses, the Pentateuch, or Torah.The second contains all the books of theProphets the so-called major and minor prophets.The writings are all the rest,which include both books of history such as the Kings and Samuel, as well as the<span>books of Peotry such as Job, Psalms and Proverbs</span></span>
3 0
3 years ago
What connection does that Bible story and Dylan's song have with ethics and the so-called "Divine Command Theory" as espoused by
Darina [25.2K]

The connection is that Dylan's song ("Highway 61 Revisited") and "that Bible story" (Abraham sacrificing Isaac) both point to the ethical idea that doing the right thing means doing whatever it is that is divinely commanded.  

Explanation/context:

The origins of "Divine Command Theory" stem back to a dialogue written by Plato, which has the philosopher Socrates engaged in discussion with Euthyphro about the meaning of piety or goodness.  Socrates was being accused of impiety in Athenian court.  Impiety to the Athenians meant conduct that was displeasing to the gods.  At that same time, Euthyphro was at court in Athens to prosecute his own father for having killed a servant.  Socrates asked the kinds of questions he normally did, pressing Euthyphro how he knew that prosecuting his own father was a good thing.  Euthyphro said punishing wrongdoers for wrongdoing was the pious thing to do, no matter who the wrongdoers are.  Socrates then asked Euthyphro to how we know what "piety" is -- and Euthyphro said it was doing that which is dear to the gods.  That's the "divine command" theory in a nutshell.  Bear in mind, as the dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro continued, there was much more nuanced thought about how well that definition works.  Socrates asked, for instance, "whether the pious or holy is beloved by the gods because it is holy, or holy because it is beloved of the gods."  That became a difficult conundrum for their consideration in the dialogue.

The Abraham story in the Bible follows the "divine command theory" idea. When God commanded Abraham to sacrifice his only son Isaac, the fact that God commanded it would make it right, according to divine command theory -- even though the act itself seemed horribly wrong.

Bob Dylan played with that idea in the lyrics to his song, "Highway 61 Revisited," from the album <em>Highway 61 Revisited </em>(1965) ...

<em>Oh, God said to Abraham, "Kill me a son"</em>

<em>Abe said, "Man, you must be puttin' me on"</em>

God said, "No" Abe say, "What?"

God say, "You can do what you want, Abe, but

The next time you see me comin', you better run"

Well, Abe said, "Where d'you want this killin' done?"

God said, "Out on Highway 61"

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which organism produces spores?
    7·2 answers
  • Why did Republicans in Congress attempt to impeach President Andrew Johnson?
    6·1 answer
  • what assumptions and beliefs do you think guided the fierce opposition to the civil rights movement in the South?
    12·2 answers
  • Which statement about the Great Compromise is accurate?
    10·2 answers
  • Public policy can be best defined as
    11·1 answer
  • What happened to the birthrate during the 1950’s? Use bar graph to be specific.
    10·2 answers
  • Give an example of a labor union from the reading.
    7·1 answer
  • Andrew Carnegie gained control of a large percentage of the steel industry by
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following events sparked the end of America's isolationist policy?
    7·2 answers
  • What Oklahoma highway is often referred to as the "Mother Road"?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!