Answer:
Type I error: Concluding that mean mileage is less than 32 miles per hour when actually it is greater than or equal to 32 miles per gallon.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Hypothesis:
Mean mileage for the Carter Motor Company's new sedan
We can design the null hypothesis and alternate hypothesis as:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0868b/0868b7fd37d85d87935ba1d4f1aabef976135a58" alt="H_{0}: \mu \geq 32\text{ miles per gallon}\\H_A: \mu < 32\text{ miles per gallon}"
Type I error:
- It is the false positive error.
- It is the error of rejection a true hypothesis.
Type II error:
- It is the false negative error.
- It is the non rejection of a false null hypothesis.
Thus, type I error for the given hypothesis is concluding that mean mileage is less than 32 miles per hour when actually it is greater than or equal to 32 miles per gallon.
Type II error would be concluding that mean mileage is greater than or equal to 32 miles per gallon when actually it is less than 32 miles per gallon.
4y + 3 ≤ y + 6
4y + 3 - 3 ≤ y + 6 - 3
4y ≤ y + 3
4y - y ≤ y - y + 3
3y ≤ 3
3y/3 ≤ 3/3
y ≤ 1
So any value of y less than or equal to 1 (so 1 is included in the solution set) satisfies the inequality. C is the correct answer.
Use a protractor. Place the whole on the dot of the angle and you should know how to do the rest.
Answer:
Kindly check explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Given :
Years of experience (X) :
1
3
3
5
7
8
10
10
12
12
Annual sales (Y) :
85
97
95
97
105
106
122
120
113
134
The estimated regression equation obtained is :
y = b0 + b1x
b0 = 82.82967
b1 = 3.46061
ŷ = 3.46061X + 82.82967
The change in annual sales for every year of experience is given by the slope value, b1 = 3.46061 = 3.5 (1 decimal place)
The Coefficient of determination R² = 0.8477 = 0.848 ( 3 decimal place).
The Coefficient of determination gives the proportion of explained variance.
About 84.8% percent variation in annual sales can be explained by years of experience of the sales person.
Using the regression equation :
ŷ = 3.46061X + 82.82967
Years of experience, x = 8
ŷ = 3.46061(8) + 82.82967 = 110.514
111 = (to the nearest whole number)
The horizontal distance between Carl and the rock at sea is approximately 60.62ft.
Data;
- Angle = 30 degree
- Opposite = 35
- Adjacent = x
<h3>Trigonometric Ratio</h3>
Given the angle of depression from his point to the sea, we can use trigonometric ratio to calculate for the horizontal distance from his location to the bottom of the sea.
SOHCAHTOA
Since we have the value of angle and opposite and we need to calculate the adjacent side of the right-angle triangle, we can use the tangent of the angle to this effect.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9699/c9699cd8bc88de9ad9d64aa69b27e940753c1033" alt="Tan\theta = \frac{opposite}{adjacent} \\tan 30 = \frac{35}{x}\\ x = \frac{35}{tan30}\\ x = 60.62ft"
The horizontal distance between Carl and the rock at sea is approximately 60.62ft.
Learn more on trigonometric ratio here;
brainly.com/question/12172664