<u>The federal government lagged behind the private sector in technological advancements because:</u>
The federal government has made poor decisions in technology investments.
The federal government has squandered hundreds of millions of dollars on costly IT projects.
Answer: Options A and D
<u>Explanation:</u>
The federal government invests hundreds of millions of dollars on costly IT projects and tops among organizations in the world. Now also the information exchanging form is out of date like mailing CDs, using outdated computer systems, etc but the government progressed in the 20th century by becoming both as benefactor and beneficiary of technology.
The major development of IBM hiked from government-led orders like the early mainframes during the Cold War was utilized by the defense department, the very first network resembling today’s Internet “ARPANET” funded by the defense department.
But the government also has been seen behaving sluggishly as said by the chairperson of the subcommittee on federal financial management named Sen.Thomas R. Carper who also conveyed that 100's of millions of dollars investment was poorly planned by federal government reasons were like inappropriate management of IT projects and followed IT investments which were photostat kind.
Governments aid the weaker and poorer sections of the society, and social Darwinists would not have approved the same, as they think that only the most efficient should be successful. They would also disapprove the steps of encouraging small businesses and would have also not liked the trustbusting.
<span>Alfred Binet linked intelligence and testing as indicators linked to success. As a result, the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales were created; the most updated version being released in 2003. They show a fair correlation of predicting success patterns according to psychological observations across time.</span>