<h2>Through t
he concept of prosecutorial immunity.</h2>
Explanation:
In Kalina v. Fletcher (1997), the court ruled that a prosecutor may be sued for making false statements of fact in an affidavit in support of an arrest warrant. This is occurred when Prosecutor Kalina was sued by Fletcher for making two inaccurate factual statements regarding him during his trial.
Prosecutor Kalina, therefore, seeked the provisions of prosecutorial immunity from the court to gain immunity. However, this was rejected as the court claimed that a prosecutor may be sued for making false statements of fact in an affidavit in support of an arrest warrant.
This ruling correlate with the concept of prosecutorial immunity becuase she was denied of such immunity. It ruled that her conduct could not be protected through prosecutorial immunity.
B. The civil rights legislation
Answer: Ur from sahwa la? ins assessment LOL
Explanation:
The United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union joined forces to fight the Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, and Imperial Japan. The United States entered the war. The war ended in a treaty and Germany had to finish paying WWI era repairs.<span />
The answer is D) The battle of Chickamauga.
Why is the answer D)? well its D) because the Battle of Chickamauga was fought between September 18-20, 1863. It involved the second highest number of casualties in the war, behind only Gettysburg. It was a decisive victory for the Confederate troops under the command of General Braxton Bragg and resulted in the withdrawal of Union forces to Chattanooga.
