1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
qwelly [4]
3 years ago
9

How did technology, logistics, and communication allow the North to defeat the South?

History
1 answer:
Alexeev081 [22]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

It enabled them to wage a modern war

Explanation:

The Northern states supplied the military with all the means necessary to wage a modern war, producing large quantities of ammunition and other supplies, and in doing so financing the war with its industrial capacity. The Midwest supplied the Union with soldiers, food, horses as well as financially. Military hospitals were located throughout the territory of the Union.

The national banking system was reformed during this period, and prosperity was stimulated by heavy spending by the federal government. Union countries have invested a great deal of money and effort in psychological and social support for soldiers, their wives, widows and orphans.

You might be interested in
Which option is an example of inductive reasoning ?
topjm [15]

Answer:the correct answer is she keeps winning coin tosses. Therefore, she will win the next one

Explanation:

I just took the test

7 0
3 years ago
What do you think are the characteristics that make a piece of writing a history?
Alexxx [7]

First, they are themselves scholars of history. Second, they expect you to engage in the practice of history. In other words, they frequently want you to use information to make an educated guess about some bygone event, era, or phenomenon. You probably know how to guess about the past.

3 0
3 years ago
Question 25
Vsevolod [243]

The serious difficulty for the national government under the Articles of Confederation is "It lacked the authority to raise money to support itself ".

<u> Explanation: </u>

The Article of Confederation gave away most of the power to the state and federal government had only limited control over the state. Particularly this article made a power less national government during the American Revolution.  

The American states were of the opinion that if the strong national government is there in the central means it may affect the autonomy of the states.

So the states were strongly objected to the formation of strong central government and felt that the most decision making power should be with them.

The downfall of The Article of confederation was simply because it has no power to make laws to control the states.

5 0
3 years ago
What term defines the income paid to the owner of land, labor, or capital in return for productive service?
iogann1982 [59]
It's C, factor payment.


You're welcome!
8 0
3 years ago
The congress shall have power to... make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing
Leona [35]

Correct answer:  C. Implied powers

The quoted lines are often referred to as the "necessary and proper" clause of the United States Constitution, which asserts that Congress has implied powers beyond the specifically stated ones in the Constitution..  After enumerating a number of the powers of Congress, including borrowing money, coining money, regulating commerce, etc, Section 8 of Article I of the Constitution closes by saying Congress shall have power "to make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."  That's a quite broad and sweeping statement, which goes beyond specifically delegated powers and gives Congress additional implied powers.  

An example of the implementation of such implied powers in the Constitution occurred when Alexander Hamilton, as our nation's first Secretary of the Treasury, argued in favor of establishing a national bank.  Hamilton believed that anything that is not strictly forbidden in the Constitution is allowable.  A national bank was not strictly listed as something Congress could establish, but there was nothing in the Constitution to prohibit it.  And the "necessary and proper" clause gave leeway to create it, by the implied powers given to Congress.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Atlantic Charter was an agreement between which countries? (8 points)
    10·1 answer
  • A recognized group of people who share a language, culture, or religion is called
    6·2 answers
  • Those who supported the Vietnam War and those who opposed it were nicknamed
    10·2 answers
  • Ottoman architecture
    7·2 answers
  • Who were the vikings and how did they leave an impact on the middle ages? ⚡️
    8·2 answers
  • How did the ancient Greeks influence writing?<br><br> PLEASE USE AT LEAST 3 SENTENCESSSSSSSS
    13·1 answer
  • The "Great Awakening" was...
    9·1 answer
  • What did the federal government do in response to the South's dealings<br> with newly freed slaves?
    13·1 answer
  • he French goal to weaken the power of religion over government was inspired by which Enlightenment idea?
    12·2 answers
  • “i personally feel that alexander the great did nothing to deserve that title of greatness. eventually his pride cause him to fa
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!