1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
torisob [31]
4 years ago
8

Why was the Supreme Court’s decision in the Wabash, St. Louis, and Pacific Railroad v. Illinois case an obstacle to state govern

ment reform measures?
A. The Supreme Court ruled that states cannot regulate grain storage fees.
B. The Supreme Court ruled that states cannot regulate interstate railroads.
C. The Supreme Court ruled that states cannot regulate any businesses at all.
D.The Supreme Court ruled that states cannot regulate manufacturers.
History
2 answers:
ololo11 [35]4 years ago
7 0
One of the main reasons why the Supreme Court’s decision in the Wabash, St. Louis, and Pacific Railroad v. Illinois case was an obstacle to state government reform measures was because "<span>B. The Supreme Court ruled that states cannot regulate interstate railroads," since this meant that the rail companies could often exploit the states and towns. </span>
stellarik [79]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

B. The Supreme Court ruled that states cannot regulate interstate railroads.

You might be interested in
Which of the following ways has the green revolution be unfriendy to the environment
Roman55 [17]
I’m not really sure about this question
6 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast the treatment of different religions by rulers of the Arab empire. HELP!
Lesechka [4]

Answer:

Explanation:

Overview

Islam spread through military conquest, trade, pilgrimage, and missionaries.

Arab Muslim forces conquered vast territories and built imperial structures over time.

Most of the significant expansion occurred during the reign of the Rashidun from 632 to 661 CE, which was the reign of the first four successors of Muhammad.

The caliphate—a new Islamic political structure—evolved and became more sophisticated during the Umayyad and Abbasid caliphates.

Over a period of a few hundred years, Islam spread from its place of origin in the Arabian Peninsula all the way to modern Spain in the west and northern India in the east.

Islam traveled through these regions in many ways. Sometimes it was carried in great caravans or sea vessels traversing vast trade networks on land and sea, and other times it was transferred through military conquest and the work of missionaries. As Islamic ideas and cultures came into contact with new societies, they were expressed in unique ways and ultimately took on diverse forms.

Different trajectories

To begin to understand the rich history of Islam, let’s start with the historical context and events that led to Islam’s spread. For example, Islam initially spread through the military conquests of Arab Muslims, which happened over a very short period of time soon after the beginning of Islam. However, only a small fraction of the people who came under Arab Muslim control immediately adopted Islam. It wasn’t until centuries later, at the end of the eleventh century, that Muslims made up the majority of subjects of the Islamic empires.

The spread of Islam through merchants, missionaries, and pilgrims was very different in nature. These kinds of exchanges affected native populations slowly and led to more conversion to Islam. As Islamic ideas traveled along various trade and pilgrimage routes, they mingled with local cultures and transformed into new versions and interpretations of the religion.

Another important thing to note is that not all military expansion was Arab and Muslim. Early on in Islamic history, under the Rashidun caliphate—the reign of the first four caliphs, or successors, from 632 to 661 CE—and the Umayyad caliphate, Arab Muslim forces expanded quickly. With the Abbasids, more non-Arabs and non-Muslims were involved in the government administration. Later on, as the Abbasid caliphate declined, there were many fragmented political entities, some of which were led by non-Arab Muslims. These entities continued to evolve in their own ways, adopting and putting forth different interpretations of Islam as they sought to consolidate their power in different regions.

The first Arab Muslim empire

During the seventh century, after subduing rebellions in the Arabian peninsula, Arab Muslim armies began to swiftly conquer territory in the neighboring Byzantine and Sasanian empires and beyond. Within roughly two decades, they created a massive Arab Muslim empire spanning three continents. The Arab Muslim rulers were not purely motivated by religion, nor was their success attributed to the power of Islam alone, though religion certainly played a part.

This is the complete explanation of your question i hope you get the idea thanks.

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why would Mirabeau Lamar not want Texas to join the U.S.?
enot [183]

Answer:

incomplete question.

Explanation:

Surely there is more to this question? or background.

3 0
3 years ago
7. Which was the purpose of ziggurats in ancient Sumer?
nalin [4]
The answer would be : <span>C. to be temples for the gods and goddesses.

Hope this helps !

Photon</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were the Reconstruction plans of President Abraham Lincoln and President Andrew Johnson similar?
algol [13]

Answer:

Both Lincoln's and Johnson's Reconstruction plans were lenient compared to the Radical Republicans plan. Lincoln wanted a quick reintegration of the Southern states reinstatement to Congress. Lincoln believed the South did not succeed or have actually left the Union. This was a legal position that would be born out in Texas vs. White 1869. Obviously they formed governments and made war on the Union.

The problem was Lincoln was assassinated and Johnson did not have Lincoln's political capital to fight the Radicals. They could never have challenged Lincoln with impeachment as they did Johnson.

Explanation:

Both Lincoln's and Johnson's Recreation plans were indulgent compared to the Radical Republicans arrange. Lincoln needed a fast reintegration of the Southern states restoration to Congress. Lincoln accepted the South did not succeed or have really cleared out the Union. This was a lawful position that would be born out in Texas vs. White 1869. Clearly they shaped governments and made war on the Union. The issue was Lincoln was killed and Johnson did not have Lincoln's political capital to battle the Radicals. They may never have challenged Lincoln with prosecution as they did Johnson.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • what were the differences between the working class, upper class during the socialist reformers during the progressive era
    14·1 answer
  • How did the formation of the United States contribute to the Enlightenment in<br> Europe?
    10·1 answer
  • Why did totalitarian states rise after World War I, and what did they do?
    6·1 answer
  • What does the "M" in the " 'MAIN' causes of World War I" represent?
    15·2 answers
  • What did farm life and city life have in common during the Han dynasty?
    5·1 answer
  • How do fish regulate body temperature to prevent freezing or overheating?
    10·2 answers
  • What style of government did the Greeks get credit for creating?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the longest greatsword ever in history. please help!
    11·1 answer
  • How did President Jackson restrict the power of the Second Bank of the United States prior to the end of its charter?
    13·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP TIMER
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!