1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vlada-n [284]
3 years ago
7

Who were two international leaders that met with President Carter during the famous Camp David Accords?

History
2 answers:
velikii [3]3 years ago
4 0

Answering the question, the international leaders that met with president carter during the famous Camp David accords are Menachem Begin and Anwar Sadat.

The Camp David accords were signed by both Menachem Begin and Anwar Sadat. The agreement was signed on September 17, 1978, and was witnessed by President jimmy carter. At that time, Menachem begin was Israeli prime minster and Anwar Sadat was the Egyptian president.

<h2>Further Explanation</h2>

The Camp David accords consisted of a series of agreements that were meant to resolve the fractious relationship between Israel and Egypt.

The main reason why both leaders signed the Camp David accords was to establish a framework that will restore peace in the Middle East.

The agreements were to formalize the Arab recognition of Israel to existence as a country. The agreements also paved the way for the withdrawals of the Israeli military from the occupied territories and also to ensure that the security of the Israelis.

Egypt and Israel had engaged in conflicts since the creation of Israel in 1948. Both countries have engaged in a six-day war in 1967 and also the Yom Kippur war in 1973.

Therefore, the two international leaders that met with president carter during the famous Camp David accords are Menachem Begin and Anwar Sadat.

LEARN MORE:

  • Who were two international leaders that met with president carter during the famous camp David accords?  brainly.com/question/446780
  • Who were two international leaders that met with President Carter during the famous Camp David Accords?  brainly.com/question/9089752

KEYWORDS:

  • Egypt
  • isreal
  • camp david accords
  • agreement
  • president cater
garik1379 [7]3 years ago
3 0
1 and 3 are your answer. :)
You might be interested in
Ffjgffghgc CNN of jfsxchxg
olga2289 [7]
Sjhssbjsjwjsbsbsbsabsbsjwjwhwbwbwbwhshshsjshshsbsbsbsbsbsbshwiwjwbsbjwjw
8 0
3 years ago
Question 12
m_a_m_a [10]

Answer:

The average number of misprints per page in a company’s annual reports is 0.4. If a page is selected

at random, find the probability that it will contain more than two misprints. (5 marks)

(b) On average, one in every four new clients approached by an insurance salesman purchases an insurance policy. Suppose that the salesman approaches five new clients.

(i) Find the probability that exactly two will buy a policy. (5 marks)

(ii) Find the probability that at least two will buy a policy. (5 marks)

4 0
3 years ago
If the quantity demanded of a new mountain bike is 8,000 and the quantity supplied is 6,000, then _____.
Margarita [4]
I believe it is ¨there is a shortage of 2,000 bikes¨ because if they demand 8,000 bikes but only make 6,000 bikes there is a shortage of 2,000 bikes 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is the best conclusion one could make from the map above?
fiasKO [112]

Answer:

Paleolithic humans originated in one continent and then spread to many parts of the world

Explanation:

:)

5 0
2 years ago
1. How does the author characterize the
nexus9112 [7]

Answer:s the United States enters the 21st century, it stands unchallenged as the world’s economic leader, a remarkable turnaround from the 1980s when many Americans had doubts about U.S. “competitiveness.” Productivity growth—the engine of improvement in average living standards—has rebounded from a 25-year slump of a little more than 1 percent a year to roughly 2.5 percent since 1995, a gain few had predicted.

Economic engagement with the rest of the world has played a key part in the U.S. economic revival. Our relatively open borders, which permit most foreign goods to come in with a zero or low tariff, have helped keep inflation in check, allowing the Federal Reserve to let the good times roll without hiking up interest rates as quickly as it might otherwise have done. Indeed, the influx of funds from abroad during the Asian financial crisis kept interest rates low and thereby encouraged a continued boom in investment and consumption, which more than offset any decline in American exports to Asia. Even so, during the 1990s, exports accounted for almost a quarter of the growth of output (though just 12 percent of U.S. gross domestic product at the end of the decade).

Yet as the new century dawns, America’s increasing economic interdependence with the rest of the world, known loosely as “globalization,” has come under attack. Much of the criticism is aimed at two international institutions that the United States helped create and lead: the International Monetary Fund, launched after World War II to provide emergency loans to countries with temporary balance-of-payments problems, and the World Trade Organization, created in 1995 during the last round of world trade negotiations, primarily to help settle trade disputes among countries.

The attacks on both institutions are varied and often inconsistent. But they clearly have taken their toll. For all practical purposes, the IMF is not likely to have its resources augmented any time soon by Congress (and thus by other national governments). Meanwhile, the failure of the WTO meetings in Seattle last December to produce even a roadmap for future trade negotiations—coupled with the protests that soiled the proceedings—has thrown a wrench into plans to reduce remaining barriers to world trade and investment.

For better or worse, it is now up to the United States, as it has been since World War II, to help shape the future of both organizations and arguably the course of the global economy. A broad consensus appears to exist here and elsewhere that governments should strive to improve the stability of the world economy and to advance living standards. But the consensus breaks down over how to do so. As the United States prepares to pick a new president and a new Congress, citizens and policymakers should be asking how best to promote stability and growth in the years ahead.

Unilateralism

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How was trade between American and European countries affected by war?
    9·1 answer
  • Which best describes why the location of the swahili coast made it a center of trade?
    6·2 answers
  • How did Russia surprise Germany early in the war?
    8·1 answer
  • Despite the fall of rome the byzantine empire continued to stay strong because justinian
    7·1 answer
  • Describe the route of long march
    13·1 answer
  • What value will be the basis of your constitutional article? Write your constitutional value and define it with your own words.
    9·1 answer
  • The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand is to WWI as
    13·1 answer
  • Racial segregation of American troops had been made illegal _____.
    12·1 answer
  • Who likes eminem here
    7·2 answers
  • What stance does Adams take on religion and law?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!