Write an opening statement that describes a policy approach for a presidential candidate<span>. ... Your job is to </span>write an opening statement that describes<span> the </span>candidate's approach<span> to solving a major issue in education: the rising cost of college. I hope this helps you out have an amazing dat!!!!</span>
Answer=C
William T. Sherman, led Shermans March. Which basically was his military marching through Georgia and destroying all the fields and very many building as they headed towards the sea. This is an example of total war.
Answer:
British governments left the colonies largely alone to govern themselves.
Explanation:
Salutary neglect: series of administrative policy measures created by the British government in the mid-18th century in relation to the American colonies. These measures presented a relaxation in the supervision of the administration of the colonies, leaving them increasingly autonomous in their management, encouraging the ideals of independence.
Answer:
Jews believe in individual and collective participation in an eternal dialogue with God through tradition, rituals, prayers and ethical actions. Christianity generally believes in a Tribune God, one person of whom became human. Judaism emphasizes the Oneness of God and rejects the Christian concept of God in human form.
Explanation:
source google
Answer:
The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.
Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.
For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.
Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.
