1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mazyrski [523]
3 years ago
10

When Gandhi reached the Arabian Sea at the end of the Salt March, he picked up raw salt from the water and made a declaration: “

With this, I am shaking the foundations of the British Empire.” How do you think this quotation is symbolic of Gandhi’s works and philosophy?
History
2 answers:
Sliva [168]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Gadhi was referring to the mud salt he was holding during the famous salt march. The importance of the salt march to the protest movement was that it exemplified the depth of colonial laws and their effects on Indian society. while other nationalists had been skeptical of the salt march,its importance to the natioanlist movement can not be underestimated, mainly because of its non-confrontational nature.

Explanation:

Delvig [45]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Gandhi believed that nonviolent protest was a powerful force that could intimidate even an oppressor as powerful as the British Empire. Picking up the sea salt was a simple act. However, when thousands of people united peacefully for the salt march in defiance of British laws, a silent blow was delivered to British rule. An act as small as picking up a handful of salt ignited the spark of nonviolent protest across India and managed to “shake the foundations of the British Empire.” The quotation illustrates Gandhi’s faith and confidence in the power of nonviolence.--plato sample answer

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What's a channel when it involves bodies of water, and how did it lead to a myth about Yü the Great?
Lesechka [4]

Answer:

im sorry

Explanation:

I cant help you you need to decide on your own destiny

5 0
3 years ago
The photo shows a church in Poulsbo, Washington.
belka [17]

Answer:

Between 1900 and 1915, more than 15 million immigrants arrived in the United States. That was about equal to the number of immigrants who had arrived in the previous 40 years combined. In 1910, three-fourths of New York City's population were either immigrants or first generation Americans (i.e. the sons and daughters of immigrants).

Not only were the numbers of immigrants swelling, the countries from which they came had changed dramatically as well. Unlike earlier immigrants, the majority of the newcomers after 1900 came from non-English speaking European countries. The principal source of immigrants was now southern and eastern Europe, especially Italy, Poland, and Russia, countries quite different in culture and language from the United States, and many immigrants had difficulty adjusting to life here.

At the same time, the United States had difficulty absorbing the immigrants. Most of the immigrants chose to settle in American cities, where jobs were located. As a result, the cities became ever more crowded. In addition, city services often failed to keep up with the flow of newcomers. Most of the immigrants did find jobs, although they often worked in jobs that most native-born Americans would not take. Over time, however, many immigrants succeeded in improving their condition.

To find additional documents in Loc.gov, search the collections using such terms as immigration, immigrant, or people from specific countries (e.g., Polish, Irish, or Italian).

IF YOU READ IT YOU WILL FIND THE ANSWER

HATE IF YOU DON'T WANT AND THANK ME IF YOU LIKE IT LOVE YAHH

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What precipitated the bitter conflict in the d Alene district​
prisoha [69]

Answer:

Wage cuts in the silver and lead mines.

5 0
3 years ago
What was one way that colonial women frequently contributed to political protests during the Revolutionary Era?
Ann [662]

The Correct answer is option:

<u> D. by participating in anti-British mob activity </u>

Women in the Colonial Era didn't speak out against the "men" so that one's wrong. They didn't join the "sons of Liberty" organization because it was a Guy's thing the only members were men. So now that it's between these two answers the answer I would go with is D. because when they did mob things they usually disguised themselves which you don't really do that in Assemblies.

8 0
3 years ago
Which person would most likely say, "I think the U.S. national anthem should be easier to sing
nika2105 [10]

Answer:

B or C

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was a crucial advantage that the english colonies had over other european colonists?
    5·1 answer
  • How did texans react to centralized power by mexico?
    10·1 answer
  • how did the civil rights movement evolve over time and who did competing ideas and political alliance affect its growth and that
    14·1 answer
  • By 1962 which of these did 90% of American families own?
    9·1 answer
  • The debates between the federalists and the anti-federalists were primarily about
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following has pure market economy
    14·1 answer
  • What do the Piney Woods and Gulf Coast Plain regions of Texas have in COMMON​
    6·1 answer
  • Don’t answer this question?
    13·1 answer
  • What is Imperialism? Why did nations engage in this practice?
    14·2 answers
  • (02.05 HC)
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!