<span>I usually think of biology first, and then physics. I trust those types of science a whole lot more than social sciences. I don't think of it like most non-sciency people do (like with diet pills and perfume). I think of it like using the actual scientific method, doing the same thing over and again expecting different results, taking the objective (or subjective, when that applies) results and forming a logical conclusion and not one that fits your hypothesis/agenda. Kind of like those kids that every high school has (on TV shows, they're the ones that are doing something with robotics all the time) that are nerdy, science geeks always running experiments and seeing what happens. </span>
---------___euphoria___------------
The carrying capacity for a species in an ecosystem is primarily determined by the resources in the ecosystem.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The availability of food, raw materials, water and other resources in that ecosystem are those factors that is used for the determination of the carrying capacity. The factors such as nature, the levels of wastage accumulation, removal of very important things from the system also determines the carrying capacity. a system's carrying capacity may involve matters such as available supplies of food, water, raw materials, and/or other similar resources.
The main components that determines the carrying capacity of an ecosystem are food and other resources, provided, the humans must not disturb the ecosystem for their self survival. The resources limitations and their availability determines this factor to a greater extent.
Answer:
no they are not herbivores they are carnivores.......
hope it helps
pls mark as brainliest......
The light dependent reaction and the Calvin cycle
