Answer:
a. enforce the contract or recover what she invested with Finlay.
Explanation:
From the question we are informed about Frank which Through fraudulent means, he induces Ethel to sign a contract to invest with him the profits from her business. In this case When Ethel learns the truth, she may enforce the contract or recover what she invested with Frank. Contract can be regarded as an agreement that exist between two parties which could be private parties to create obligation which is mutual and is enforceable under law, element needed for a contract to be valid is that there must be valid offer as well as acceptance.
Answer: The correct answer is "a. decisions under risk.".
Explanation: The decision situations wherein the decision-maker chooses to consider several possible outcomes and the probabilities of their occurrence can be stated are called <u>decisions under risk.</u>
Decision-making under risk is one of the three possible decision-making scenarios based on the available information, this scenario presents an intermediate situation between decision-making under certainty or under uncertainty: each alternative, strategy or course of action has several possible consequences, but the person in charge of making the decision knows the probability of each of them.
my question is why do we need to do it i know you asked nicely but i just wanna know
Answer: I think she should choose D.
Explanation: D because, she should call the bank freeze all of her accounts before anyone can find her cards, and then she can get a new card.
Answer:
the value of the quick ratio is 1.11 times
Explanation:
The computation of the value of the quick ratio is shown below:
Quick Ratio = Total Quick Assets ÷ Total current liabilities
= [Cash + Accounts Receivables] ÷ Accounts Payable
= [$145 + $99] ÷ $219
= $244 ÷ $219
= 1.11 Times
Hence, the value of the quick ratio is 1.11 times
