France lost its territory in Canada and east of the Mississippi river.
It would be more logical to have an abundant amount of resources than to be in a center of a training route. Thomas Jefferson's Embargo Act of 1807 is an example. America suffered more even though it was meant to punish France and Great Britain. If America had more supplies then they wouldn't have any issue with trading with someone else. America is across the sea so it is hard to believe they were in the center of the training route.
Having a good location is important, but if there isn't enough to trade then that creates more issues. One would be that the area could become a reputation for being unreliable. It does come to the question if the loads of resources is worth traveling for or to take a route that's faster but there isn't a lot of give. Being isolated also means that of there happens to be an issue in the trade then the location is either off the maps or people don't want to there because of the distance and the prices might be able to go up. That's why resources are better than location.
In 2011 voters voted against recalling the governor of Wisconsin
Answer:
By Researching ancient ruins
Explanation:
In order to have better understanding on history, many Italian Scholars set up several anthropology expeditions to study the ancient ruins that were left over by the empires in the past.
From this expedition, they managed to find various types of artworks, literature, scripture, etc.
All of those things above often contained information's that the scholars can use to decipher Roman and Greek's society situation in the past. They served as pieces of puzzles that complete their knowledge about their history.