The destruction of the Berlin Wall and the breakup of the Soviet Union signify the:

2 answers:

7 0

The Berlin Wall: The Fall of the Wall. On November 9, 1989, as the Cold War began to thaw across Eastern Europe, the spokesman for East Berlin's Communist Party announced a change in his city's relations with the West. Starting at midnight that day, he said, citizens of the GDR were free to cross the country's borders.

dlinn [17]3 years ago

4 0

A end of the cold war is the correct answer because the wall was a symbol of communist control. after the wall was torn down it was a huge victory for democracy. Hope this helps :)

You might be interested in

Muhammad religious conversion missionary work and death took place

Dimas [21]

In the 7th century A.D.

3 0

3 years ago

What were wagon trains in the 1800's really like?

nikklg [1K]

Wagon trains were caravans of covered wagons each wagon pulled by horses. This is the type of caravan that saw used traveling the orogen trail and by other settlers moving west across the united states. Played the computer game "Oregon Trail" to get a realistic idea of what life on a Wagon Train may have been like...."Oops you died of starvation."

6 0

3 years ago

What is the primary information that a map shows? A. the location of a place in the world B. the hidden features underneath Eart

atroni [7]

Answer:

A. the location of a place in the world

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Question: How did a dynasty lose or gain the Mandate of Heaven?

LekaFEV [45]

Answer:

B> - If the ruling dynasty was fair, it would keep the Mandate of Heaven.

Explanation:

The Mandate of Heaven was a belief in the establishment of a ruler from the qualities of a person. Under this Mandate, there is no specific rule that determines who can or cannot become the ruler. Rather, a person's qualities, such as being fair, just, how well he can rule, or how 'good' he is in terms of his behavior and qualities.

The belief that such a ruler is determined from the internal qualities comes from the idea of the ruler being the "son of heaven". In other words, such type of person is good, just, kind, fair, and does not indulge in immoral or bad activities, which makes him ideal for a leader. Moreover, he will also be accepted by the gods, which is a huge factor.

So, if a ruling dynasty or a ruler is fair, he can keep the Mandate of Heaven but if not, then the Mandate cannot be his.

Thus, the correct answer is option B.

4 0

3 years ago

Do you accept or reject the notion of “good and evil?” Explain your reasoning

rewona [7]

Answer:

i dont know..

Explanation:

i think i would accept the good and evil because god put you on this path for a reason (or whoever you believe in I'm trying to make you all included)

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers