Answer:
i might be wrong but it should be B.
Explanation:
declaring war immigration
Answer: C
Explanation: CAn i get brainiest please
Answer: Hobbes believed people were naturally selfish and violent.
<u>Further explanation</u>:
Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people. But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.
Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War. He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result. Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.
John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England. Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings. Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.
In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way. If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way. Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved. Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith. But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke. :-)
Clerics from Buddhist set themselves on fire to protest pro-American south Vietnamese policies in the early 1960s in south Vietnam.
Buddhist monks set themselves on fire in 1963 as a protest against the puppet Diem regime in South Vietnam. Buddhist monk Thich Quang Duc publicly burns himself to death in a plea for President Ngo Dinh Diem to reveal “charity and compassion” to all religions.
Despite the fact that South Vietnam's three to 4 million Buddhists made up almost eighty percent of the population, they were discriminated against by using the Catholic ruling elite. On might also 8, 1963, Buddhist followers within the metropolis of Hue celebrated the Buddha's 2,527th birthday.
Priests who practiced Buddhism immolated themselves in the course of the ensuing weeks. Madame Nhu, the president's sister-in-law, referred to the burnings as “barbecues” and offered to deliver suits. In November 1963, South Vietnamese army officers assassinated Diem and his brother all through a coup.
Learn more about Buddhism here brainly.com/question/8920497
#SPJ4
Means an artifact related to others. In archaeology.
