One key difference between Bentham’s and Mill’s respective versions of utilitarianism is that …

1 answer:

3 0

Below are the differences between Bentham’s and Mill’s respective versions of utilitarianism:

1. The qualitative distinction

Bentham pots concede to any distinction in propensities yet Mill arranged human inclinations and by ethical news of subjective contrast called some honorable and another base. Along these lines, it is said that scholarly propensities are far better than physiological inclinations.

2. Qualitative distinction in pleasures:

Similarly, Mill made subjective refinements in various joys. As indicated by Bentham, all delights are comparable. In the event that the amount of joy is the same, at that point, there is no distinction amongst verse and pushpin. As opposed to this, as indicated by Mill, 'It is ideal to be a person disappointed than a pig fulfilled, better to be a Socrates disappointed than a trick fulfilled.

You might be interested in

How did jimmy carter turn his lack of experience into an advantage during the 1976 campaign

Grace [21]

Appealed to voters by emphasizing his lack of experience in federal government, and both his personal honesty and his religious piety

4 0

2 years ago

What helped China achieve rapid economic growth in the late twentieth century and early twenty-first century?

Dafna11 [192]

Answer:

I'm more leaning towards C but it might be D. I'm sorry if I didn't really fjdjdbd

8 0

2 years ago

Which was not a reason some Americans gave for scripting immigration to the United States

Sonja [21]

Tribal nations were not in the US census instill the 1880

8 0

2 years ago

1. How did Confucianism create and support a rigid social hierarchy? Who had power? Who didn't?

andre [41]

Answer:scholar-bureaucrats at the top, because they had the knowledge and wisdom to maintain social order;

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Explain what logrolling is through the disagreement between the northern states and the southern states. What does the South get

kap26 [50]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options either context or references, we can comment on the following.

Here you are probably talking about the Three-fifth Compromise, an agreement reached by the delegates that participated in the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to create the new Constitution of the United States.

Delegates from large and small states in the North and South reached an agreement during the works during the Convention. The proposal was made by delegate James Wilson.

Delegates agreed on the way slaves should be counted to determine the real population in the states. This was an important agreement because, in the end, this would the number of seats that each state would have in the lower chamber of Congress or the House of Representatives, and the number of taxes each state had to pay.

Finally, after many debates, the compromise was that they were going to count three-fifths of the state population of slaves toward the total population of the state. This allowed states from the South to have third more legislators in Congress and electoral because, in the beginning, slaves had been ignored.

7 0

2 years ago