Answer:
b. Social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
Explanation:
Social consensus can be defined as a principle or theory which is used to distinguish between what is deemed good or bad in the behavior of the people living in a society.
On the other hand, the magnitude of consequences refers to the overall harm or benefit that is associated with an ethical decision chosen by an individual or group of people.
The difference between social consensus and magnitude of consequences is that social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
The importance of ''thinking before acting'' is most consistent with the viewpoint of Bandura behaviorist
Answer: It will be released as carbon dioxide and water.
Explanation:
The body tends to stores excess carbs or protein in an individuals's diet as fat, which are known as triglyceride molecules, that mostly consist of three types of atoms, these are hydrogen, carbon, and oxygen. For individuals to lose the weight, the triglycerides will break into the building blocks, which tends to happens in a procedure referred to as oxidation.
When the triglyceride is oxidized , the procedure tends to consumes as many molecules of oxygen as possible while on the other hand producing carbon dioxide & water as the waste products.
Shannon's position might be best interpreted as <u>"ethnocentrism".</u>
Ethnocentrism is a noteworthy purpose behind divisions among individuals from various ethnicities, races, and religious gatherings in the public eye. Ethnocentrism is the conviction of predominance is one's close to home ethnic gathering, yet it can likewise create from racial or religious contrasts.
Ethnocentric people trust that they are superior to different people for reasons construct exclusively in light of their legacy. Plainly, this training is identified with issues of both bigotry and preference.
