Hey there Carlos!
Let's examine this above.
<span>Jeremy will be planting tulips in the spring.
let's take some key point's from this.
</span><span>Jeremy (will) be (planting) tulips in the spring.
The word's "will" and also "planting" are a form of the future tense.
So, in this case, we can cross out both option (c) and also (d).
Option (c) and also (d) are (present), and the sentence is not present, it would be in the future.
So, now we have both option (a) and also (b) as our last options.
This would be considered a "future perfect progressive" because the sentence shows that "he will plant tulips", which shows that this would be a future perfect goal pretty much.
Hope this helps you Carlos, and if you need any more help, never hesitate to ask more question's on Brainly
~Jurgen</span>
Answer:
simple
Explanation:
A simple sentence contains one independent clause with a subject and a predicate. Besides, it makes sense on its own and does not possess any dependent clauses. Thus, even though the subject <em>Joe King</em> is followed by an appositive phrase which identifies him -<em>an engineering professor from California</em>- the sentence still has one single independent clause consisting of a subject and a predicate.
<span>C. Fictional author </span>
<span>
The short italicized sections of the book contain the
introduction of the ‘author’ of the book who establishes himself as a character
in the text. It tells of his travels and adventures in the hopes of publishing
a book. He already had two books that flunked and thus he traveled to Bombay.
Here he became dejected as his goal to write about Portugal did not
materialize. He wandered through India and reached the town of Pondicherry
which was once controlled by the French Empire. He met Francis Adirubasamy who
became a pivotal character and started the ball rolling to create a book that
is ‘nonfiction’; fact that was
reestablished in other parts of the book with the same fashion. </span>
Contrasting is to find how things are different.
