Matching of items implies aligning items that have things in common or are similar in nature. Matched items conform with one another in meaning or relationships. Read below about this matching.
<h3>What is the appropriate matching?</h3>
The appropriate matching goes thus;
- Paramilitary: a civilian organization that has the characteristics of an army
- Militarism: the idea that a country should build a strong military to promote its standing
- Anti-Semitism: discrimination, prejudice, or hatred toward Jewish people
- Reich: the German word for "empire"
- Incentive: a reward to encourage someone to behave in a particular way.
Therefore, the correct matching is as indicated above.
Learn more about Anti-Semitism: brainly.com/question/1078780
#SPJ1
Answer:
The kingdom of Songhai, also spelled Songhay, West Africa's great trade state, focused on what is now central Mali on the middle reaches of the Niger River and gradually spreading west to the Atlantic coast and east to Niger and Nigeria.
While the Songhai people are said to have settled in the city of Gao about 800 CE, during the reign of the dia Kossoi, a Songhai convert to Islam, they did not consider it as their capital until the beginning of the 11th century. During the next 300 years, Gao prospered and expanded so much that the rulers of Mali added it to their kingdom from 1325 to 1375.
This would be Calvin Coolidge. Coolidge meant well, but left business and practically all financial matters to the whims of the market, which led to the Great Depression.
Answer: The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached among state delegates during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. Delegates disputed whether and how slaves would be counted when determining a state's total population, as this population number would determine a state's number of seats in the House of Representatives and how much it would pay in taxes. The compromise counted three out of every five slaves as people, giving the Southern states a third more seats in Congress and a third more electoral votes than if slaves had been ignored, but fewer than if slaves and free people had been counted equally.
Explanation:
