Answer: sunk costs don't increase as driving increases.
Explanation: sunk costs are irrelevant costs because they have already occured in the past and cannot be avoided. Sunk costs thus do not differ between alternatives, and are unavoidable. The calculation for insurance and other sunk costs are likely not based on the amount of rides the Uber picks up, but rather calculated at a constant rate. So regardless of whether or not the rider pays more or less than the $.50 on the insurance, this will not have any effect on the insurance that is constant and has likely already been paid out.
Answer:
The correct answer is the option 3: if the price of corn rises because of increased demand for corn, land rents will rise to absorb most of the extra revenue received by tenant corn farmers.
Explanation:
To begin with, in David Ricardo's statment it is established that ''the rent is paid because the price of the corn is high'' therefore it is understandable that it is stated that <em><u>the price of the corn is not a cause of the rent but it is the opposite</u></em>, the price causes the rent due to the fact that <u><em>the rent is not a cost</em></u> that has to go within the price but the price goes first and then the rent happens. Therefore that if there it an increase in the population and that causes and<em> increase in the demand of the corn, then the price will rise and consequently the rent will rise</em> to in order to obtain the most of the extra revenue that it can.
Answer:
$785.34
Explanation:
The computation of the seller's share of the tax bill is shown below:
= Expected estate taxes for the year × number of days of the tax year ÷ total number of days in a year
= $31,50 × 91 days ÷ 365 days
= $785.34
We simply applied the proportionate method so that the approximate value could be arrived by taking all the information which is mentioned in the question.
To prevent monopolies. The law was also created to make competition in the market place.
