Answer:
(C) Partner A will have a smaller loss absorption potential than L
Explanation:
Recall the quote in the "first step" section of this site, "You can manage, what you can measure; you can measure, what you can define; you can define, what you can understand". ... It helps us build a clear understanding of a concept or a phenomenon so that it can be unambiguously measured.
<em><u>PLEASE.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u> MARK</u></em><em><u> ME</u></em><em><u> AS</u></em><em><u> BRILLIANT</u></em><em><u> ANSWER</u></em>
Answer:
Vulerability and Risk
Explanation:
Uncertainity is the vulnerability of an outcome and is not quantifiable whereas the risk is that the firm will be affected by an outcome which is quantifiable. So here the vulnerability of a system is its misconfiguration that has a loophole which would affect the firm and the hacker can hack these systems easily. Whereas the risk that the hacker will exploit the misconfiguration opportunity, such a hack using system misconfiguration is quantifiable and can be measured from past data and system configuration and security measures.
Answer:
The statement is: True.
Explanation:
Perfectly competitive markets are theoretical markets characterized by having many buyers and sellers, where products are homogeneous, having easy conditions for entry or exit of new firms, and where producers are price-takers because the price is determined by supply and demand.
In such a scenario, <em>companies could not set different prices such as in a price discrimination approach because consumers would rather go to the competition.</em>
