The adversarial means that it is somewhat having to be
involved into something, it may be a group, a thing or to an individual, it
could also meant of having to cause conflict or to be engage in to certain things
that will arise as conflict.
The answer is neutral stimulus- the needle itself. In
classical conditioning, when used together with an unconditioned stimulus, the
neutral stimulus becomes a conditioned stimulus. Neutral stimuli become
associated with a psychologically significant event. A neutral stimulus is a
stimulus which initially produces no specific response other than focusing
attention.
Fourth amendment right to privacy and topping a phone would be considered illegal search and seizure
Answer:
Find the explanation below.
Explanation:
The last time I experienced ineffective communication was when I tried talking to my younger sibling on the dangers of anger. I had noticed that she always threw tantrums and would always get angry when she did not get her way.
1. The communication was ineffective because I used bogus words which she found difficult to understand. In a statement I made, I mentioned that 'anger was inimical and detrimental as it predisposes a person to health issues which could lead to death'. This sentence was ineffective as she did not understand the meaning of inimical and detrimental and the possibility of death scared her.
2. The encoding and decoding stages were problematic. The encoding stage was problematic because I did not really understand the level of knowledge of my receiver. The decoding stage was also problematic because the receiver was lost as to the meaning of the words I used and misinterpreted the message.
3. Filtering is the withholding of information by a sender because he feels the receiver might not need the information. I filtered the meaning of the big words I used which were not age-appropriate.
4. I should have used words that would be understood by a five-year-old. This means that instead of using inimical and detrimental, I would have used bad or not good. Death was also not a good example to have used. I would have said that anger would make us not to be loved by our friends or any other lighter example.
Answer:
B) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 21 percent.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
A) There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 21percent.
B) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 21percent.
C) There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is greater than 21percent.
D) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is greater than 21percent.
This would be the best way to explain what this conclusion means. The hypothesis states that more than 21% of the population suffers from professional problems due to extreme shyness. Moreover, the null hypothesis states that there is no meaningful relationship between two measured phenomena. If we "fail to reject" the hypothesis, this means that we do not have evidence that shows that the hypothesis is not true. Therefore, we can claim that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 21 percent.
