Answer:
The price of the stock will be $76.97
Explanation:
We first need to determine the constant growth rate on dividends.
Growth rate (g) = (D1 - D0) / D0
Growth rate (g) = (2.08 - 2.00) / 2 = 0.04 or 4%
To calculate the price of a stock today whose dividends are growing at a constant rate, we use the constant growth model of DDM. The price of the stock today under this model is,
P0 = D1 / ( r - g )
Where,
- D1 is the dividend expected for the next year
- r is the required rate of return
- g is the growth rate
Thus, to calculate the price of the stock today at t=10, we will use the dividend expected in Year 11 or D11.
D11 = D0 * (1+g)^11
Where P10 is the price 10 years from today.
P10 = 2 * (1+0.04)^11 / (0.08 - 0.04)
P10 = $76.97
Answer: budgeted overhead costs by an expected standard activity index.
Explanation:
It should be noted that the predetermined overhead rate is typically calculated at the beginning of an accounting period. It is gotten when the estimated manufacturing overhead is divided by estimated activity base.
The standard predetermined overhead rate used in setting the standard overhead cost is determined by dividing budgeted overhead costs by the expected standard activity index. Therefore, the correct option is A.
15.79 % is the rate that bank is requred to give to potential borrowers
<u>Explanation:</u>
, APR = 0.1578917
Or 15.79% (it is rounded off )
<u>Where:
</u>
EAR = effective annual rate
APR = Annual percentage rate
M = number of compounding
Therefore, the interest of rate that the bank is required by law in order to report to all the potential borrowers is 15.97%
Answer:
If patty sues, the likely result is:
D. Patty may win under the doctrine of promissory estoppel.
Explanation:
Here, in the given question it is mentioned that Patty is a student who is poor and he is struggling to work and also keep up with her studies inspite of the difficulties.
Her uncle, Fred, promises patty that he will help him in this situation and help her with an amount of $200 per month for the next six months.
Although her uncle, Fred didn't ask her to but patty by herself quits her job so that she gives her maximum time and attention to her studies for the six months in which her uncle was going to help her.
According to what hr uncle promised he gave her the amount which he promised to but this was done for a month and then without saying anything or giving any reason he stopped giving her the amount he promised to.
So, now in this scenario if patty sues the likely result would be:
d. Patty may win under the doctrine of promissory estoppel.
Answer:
No, Hines is not guilty of unlawful price descrimination
Explanation:
Hines actions has not meet the criteria for price discrimination which include giving different prices based on gender, race or religion and never prevented the resale of product and the product package for sale never indicated the inclusion of free demonstrator and free advertising material.