Prohibition was the total prohibition on manufacture and sale of alcohol in the US, by anyone, not only by the government
so the correct answer is this one:<span>The government should call for a total halt to the manufacture and sale of liquor.</span>
The options of the question are:
A)The states in the South had to repair the damage they caused in the North. B)The states in the South had to ratify the Thirteenth Amendment. C)The land confiscated from Confederates had to be given to freedmen for farms. D)The states had to pass a law that guaranteed the freedoms of former slaves
The correct answer is B) The states in the South had to ratify the Thirteenth Amendment.
<em>Part of President Andrew Johnson’s reconstruction plan was that the states in the South had to ratify the Thirteenth Amendment.
</em>
<em>The plan of Andrew Johnson for the Reconstruction of t</em>he United States included the readmission of the Southern States once they had rewritten their state constitution. They also had to form their state governments, pay war debts and ratified the 13th Amendment. The 13th amendment abolished slavery, but President Johnson did not give former slaves the right to vote.
Answer:
The two compromises established a delicate balance between the North and the South.
Explanation:
The Great Compromise of 1787, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was a political agreement during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that defined the structure of the legislature of the United States. Under the Compromise, the legislature would be divided in two chambers: the Senate, as the upper house, where every state would have equal representation, and the Congress, the lower house, where seats would be allocated to states proportionally, according to their population. The Three-Fifths Compromise, on the other hand, was the other great compromise agreed during the Constitutional Convention. According to this compromise, three out of every five slaves would be counted as part of the population of each slave state when allocating seats for the Congress.
<u>The political significance of these two compromises was that they established a delicate balance between the North and the South.</u> For the northern states, which were generally smaller than the southern ones, the Great Compromise meant that they would be considered as equals. For the southern states, the Three-Fifths Compromise meant that they were overrepresented. If slaves had not been counted, they'd have been a minority in Congress. However, this balance was very fragile, and the disagreements between the North and South erupted into the Civil War of 1861-65,
D is the answer I hope this helps
