Renaissance is derived from the French word meaning 'rebirth'. It is used to describe this phase of European history because many of the changes experienced between the 14th and 16th centuries were inspired by a revival of the classical art and intellect of Ancient Greece and Rome.
Answer:
1) suffering
2) suffering
Explanation:
When he went outside the palace, he saw famine, old age, starvation, and other ways that people suffered in life that he had not been exposed to before.
When he lived as a monk, he wanted to find the meaning of this suffering.
Answer:
<h3> 1300</h3>
Explanation:
<h2>The Renaissance was a fervent period of European cultural, artistic, political and economic “rebirth” following the Middle Ages. Generally described as taking place from the 14th century to the 17th century, the Renaissance promoted the rediscovery of classical philosophy, literature and art.</h2>
Answer:
There are in Timbuktu numerous judges, teachers and priests, all properly appointed by the king. He greatly honors learning. Many hand-written books imported from Barbary are also sold. There is more profit made from this commerce than from all other merchandise.
Explanation:
Answer:
What does the fifth amendment protect?
The Fifth Amendment protects the right to avoid incriminating yourself. A defendant can plead the Fifth Amendment if a lawyer asks a question that the defendant would incriminate himself or herself by answering truthfully.
Explanation:
Constitutional Issue ★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★
The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution guarantees that “no person . . . shall be
compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. . . .” This right was made
part of the Bill of Rights to prevent a tyrannical government from forcing accused persons
to confess to crimes they may or may not have committed. Miranda’s case before the
Supreme Court was based on this Fifth Amendment protection. The Court accepted the
case in order to explore and clarify certain problems arising from earlier decisions related
to the rights of individuals taken into police custody. The precise question that the Court
explored was under what circumstances an interrogation may take place so that a confession made during the interrogation would be constitutionally admissible in a court of law.
★★★★★★★
